Most investors filed Rivian away a while ago. Another cash-burning Tesla wannabe, a stock that went public at a fantasy valuation, cratered, and now dilutes its shareholders every few quarters to stay alive. Nice trucks, broken business, this is a hard pass. Not a lazy take; however, it is mostly correct on the numbers as they stand today.

But it misses the more interesting question. Underneath the money-losing car company sits a software and services arm running a 42% gross margin, and a new sub-$50k SUV that just started shipping into the largest vehicle category in America.

The tension worth your attention is not whether Rivian is profitable now. It is whether the R2 ramp and that hidden software engine can reach self-funding before the balance sheet forces another raise.

The Company in Plain English

Rivian designs and builds premium electric adventure vehicles: the R1T pickup, the R1S SUV, commercial delivery vans, and now the cheaper R2 SUV. Alongside the vehicles, it runs a software and services business, anchored by a joint venture with Volkswagen that pays Rivian to license and develop its vehicle software and electrical architecture. Think of it as a carmaker with a quietly growing tech licensing operation bolted on.

The Origin Story

Rivian was founded more than fifteen years ago by RJ Scaringe, an MIT-trained engineer who was obsessed with building sustainable vehicles before it was fashionable. His first insight was ordinary: an electric sports car. His better insight was the pivot. Scaringe realized the crowded lane was passenger cars and the open white space was rugged, electric adventure vehicles that no incumbent was building well.

That pivot is why the brand exists at all, and it is why Amazon backed the company early with an order for electric delivery vans, and why Volkswagen later paid billions to get inside Rivian’s software stack. The origin was a product person solving a product problem, and that DNA is exactly where the moat comes from today.

How RIVN Makes Money

Three revenue engines, each with very different quality. The largest by revenue is automotive: selling R1, R2, and commercial vans, which brought in roughly $1.14 billion in the latest quarter.

The second is regulatory credits, the payments Rivian earns for producing zero-emission vehicles and sells to other automakers, which propped up a meaningful slice of reported gross profit.

The third, and the most interesting, is software and services, which delivered about $515 million in the latest quarter, up 37%, with roughly 60% of that flowing from the Volkswagen joint venture.

Here is the interesting part: the software arm threw off $215 million of gross profit at a 42% margin, while the car business itself still lost money on the vehicles it sold. The cars build the brand and the volume. The software prints the margin.

The Numbers That Matter

What stands out:

• Revenue growth of +27% year over year in the latest quarter. Demand is real and accelerating right as the R2 launches.

• Consolidated gross margin near 11%, a company record. Best ever, but leaning on regulatory credits and software rather than the cars themselves.

• Automotive gross profit still slightly negative. The core product does not yet pay for itself, which is the whole crux of the thesis.

• Software and services gross margin around 42%. The hidden profit engine most investors overlook, carrying the reported numbers.

• Free cash flow of negative $849 million in a single quarter. The burn is the entire risk, one quarter erased most of a capital raise.

• Cash and short-term investments of roughly $5.3 billion. Runway exists, but it is being consumed, not compounded.

Put together, these numbers tell a split-screen story. One screen shows a company growing fast with a genuinely high-margin software business emerging. The other shows a manufacturer that cannot yet fund its own operations and has leaned on equity raises, a Volkswagen debt line, an Uber investment, and a Department of Energy loan to keep the lights on.

Both screens are true at once, which is exactly why this is a watchlist for me, and not a buy.

The Moat (or Lack Thereof)

Rivian’s moat is real but narrow. The clearest source is brand premium fused with something rarer: genuine customer evangelism.

Owners talk about these trucks the way early Tesla owners once did, and the company hosted more than 57,000 demo drives in a single quarter without begging anyone to show up.

Layered on top is a technical moat that outsiders underrate. Volkswagen did not write billion-dollar checks for the sheet metal. It paid for the electrical architecture and software, the kind of integrated stack a legacy automaker cannot bolt on quickly.

Moat sources worth crediting:

• A differentiated, beloved brand in a category incumbents build poorly

• Proprietary software and electrical architecture validated by a paying partner

• An enthusiast base that markets the product for free

Now the honest stress test. The most credible threat is not one competitor, it is the whole field arriving at the R2’s price point at once: Tesla, Ford, GM, Hyundai, and a wave of lower-cost rivals. Switching costs for a car are low, and Rivian is subscale against everyone. Its manufacturing footprint cannot yet flex the way a company producing millions of units can.

The threats that keep this a Watchlist:

• Low switching costs and intense price competition in the midsize SUV tier

• Subscale production versus rivals with far deeper cost advantages

• Heavy reliance on regulatory credits that are being phased out

The Bear Case

1. The burn is existential. Rivian lost roughly $3.2 billion over the trailing twelve months and torched $849 million of free cash flow in a single quarter, which means survival still depends on outside capital rather than the business itself.

2. The R2 ramp is the entire thesis, and it is hard. Hitting the full-year delivery target requires nearly doubling the first-half production pace in the back half, a serious operational feat no matter how good the vehicle is.

3. The profits lean on props that are disappearing. Regulatory credits carried a large share of that record gross profit, and the company itself flags that these programs are being modified or phased out.

4. Confidence signals are wobbling. The chief financial officer is departing during the most important ramp in company history, and the previously stated 2027 profitability target was dropped.

   Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

The Verdict

Watchlist. The pieces of a real business are here: a founder who thinks in decades, a genuine brand, a huge runway, and a software arm most people have not noticed.

What is missing is the one thing value investors cannot skip, which is a business that pays for itself. The upgrade trigger is specific: automotive gross margin turning sustainably positive on vehicle economics alone, with regulatory credits stripped out, while quarterly cash burn narrows on a clear path toward breakeven without another dilutive raise.

Until then, the story is priced as if the hard part is finished, and the hard part is just beginning. Great products earn admiration; only self-funding businesses earn a place in the portfolio.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always do your own due diligence before making any investment decision.

Most investors think the Alphabet story is simple. It is the company that owns search, prints money from advertising, and will keep doing so forever because nobody can dislodge a verb. Buy it, forget it…

Read more

That framing is exactly wrong. What Nadella actually built is a toll road: quietly expandi…

Read more

Read more

And somewhere between a nearly $10 churro, a spontaneous five-minute Spider-Man street show that stopped the entire park in its tracks, and watching my kids completely lose their minds over characters they’ve been watching since they could sit up, I started thinking like an investor.

Not about the magic. Bu…

Read more

Not “what’s the upside?” Not “what’s the growth rate?”

The question is simpler and far more powerful:

Is this business inevitable?

Meaning: Could this company still dominate its industry 20 years from now, even if a well-funded competitor tried everything to t…

Read more

They’re wrong.

Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) stopped being an online bookstore 25 years ago. It stopped being an e-commerce play about 10 years ago. Today, it is something most investors still haven’t fully priced in: a basket of six distinct, high-quality businesses wrapped inside a single ticker. Several of whic…

Read more

At its IPO in December 2020, one analyst called it “the most ridiculous IPO of 2020.” The company had lost $667 million in 2019, operated in a brutally competitive industry, and had no clear path to profitability.

Fast forward to today: DoorDash commands over 60% of the U.S. food delivery market, operates across…

Read more

The Iran conflict. Oil near $100 a barrel. The Strait of Hormuz. A ceasefire that feels fragile. Retail investors moving to cash. Financial media playing its favorite game: catastrophizing.

And somewhere in the middle of all this noise, Warren Buffett’s most famous rule is being put to the test. Again.

“Be fearful when oth…

Read more

They look at a stock and ask: “Why will this go up?”

Charlie Munger spent his entire career asking the opposite: “How could this go wrong?”

That single shift in thinking, from chasing wins to avoiding disasters, is one of the most powerful edges a long-term investor can have. And almost nobody uses it.

Read more

SpaceX is filing its IPO prospectus with the SEC, possibly this week, targeting a June 2026 listing at a $1.75 trillion valuation.

Let that number sink in for a second.

Google went public in 2004 at a $23 billion valuation. Facebook debuted in 2012 at $81 billion. Uber (the most hyped ride-share IPO of all time) came in at $75 billion.

…

Read more

And not every controversial company is a bad one.

Hims & Hers (HIMS) sits right in that tension. It’s one of the fastest-growing consumer health platforms in the market. But it’s also one of the more debated.

This isn’t a stock pick to the Stock Pickz portfolio. It’s a breakdown so you can decide for yo…

Read more

For personal computers, it was Microsoft.
For smartphones, it was Apple.

For artificial intelligence, it’s NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA).

And the reason is simple: NVIDIA doesn’t just make AI chips. It built the entire ecosystem that modern AI runs on.

Read more

Headlines get darker. Financial news channels run constant “breaking news” banners. Social media fills with predictions of crashes, recessions, and financial catastrophe.

Suddenly, investors who were confident just weeks earlier begin questioning everything:

• Should I sell?

• Should I wait for things to cal…

Read more

The news from the Middle East weighs heavily. A long-anticipated event driven by stopping the Iranian cancer before it became an imminent threat to the US and its allies. The conflict escalated sharply on February 28, 2026, with coordinated U.S.-Israeli strikes that resulted in the death of Iran’s …

Read more

Artificial intelligence is no longer a sci-fi dream—it’s transforming how we live, work, and invest. But not all AI stocks are created equal. At Stock Pickz, we dig deep, channeling Warren Buffett’s obsession with economic moats, Peter Lynch’s knack for spotting growth, and Charlie Munger’s discipl…

Read more

Robinhood (NASDAQ: HOOD) has turned this vision into reality, tearing down the walls of traditional investing with commission-free trading, a sleek app…

Read more

Those who have the stoma…

Read more

Inspired by legends like Warren Buffett, Peter Lynch, and Charlie Munger, we hold stocks for 5-10+ years, betting on …

Read more

Read more