Most investors think the Alphabet story is simple. It is the company that owns search, prints money from advertising, and will keep doing so forever because nobody can dislodge a verb. Buy it, forget it, let it compound. The franchise is too strong to worry about.

That framing is comfortable, and it sells Alphabet short. The same AI wave that some fear will disrupt Google is the wave Google is best positioned to ride, and the company is spending close to $190 billion a year to make sure it is the one doing the disrupting. The right question is not whether Google can survive the AI era. It is how much bigger this already enormous business gets when it wins.

That is why Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL) is the newest name to earn a place on the Stock Pickz list. The work below walks through exactly how it got there.

The Company in Plain English

Alphabet is the parent company of Google. It runs the world’s dominant search engine, plus YouTube, the Android phone system, the Chrome browser, a fast-growing cloud computing business, and the Gemini family of AI products. Most of the money still comes from selling advertising, but the fastest growth now comes from renting computing power and AI tools to other companies.

The Origin Story

In the late 1990s, two Stanford graduate students named Larry Page and Sergey Brin built a research project to rank web pages by how many other pages linked to them. The insight was deceptively simple: the web itself could vote on what mattered. The search engine they built was so much better than the alternatives that users switched almost overnight, and “google” became a verb within a few years.

That early lead created a data flywheel, where more searches taught the system to return better results, which in turn attracted more searches. That same flywheel is the engine behind the company’s moat today, nearly thirty years later, and it is now being pointed directly at artificial intelligence.

How Google Makes Money

Alphabet makes money in three main ways:

• Advertising (the profit engine): When you run a search or watch a YouTube video, Google sells that attention to advertisers through automated auctions that resolve in milliseconds. This is the largest stream by far, carrying gross margins near 60%.

• Google Cloud (the growth engine): Companies pay to rent computing power, storage, and AI tools. It grew 63% last quarter to $20 billion, with a backlog of committed contracts near $462 billion.

• Subscriptions and devices: YouTube TV, YouTube Premium, Google One, and Pixel phones together total more than 350 million paid subscriptions, a steadier and increasingly meaningful layer of recurring revenue.

The simple way to hold it in your head: advertising pays the bills, while Cloud and subscriptions supply the growth.

The Numbers That Matter

Numbers tell the truth that narratives like to dress up, so here are the six that actually define the Alphabet thesis. Read together, they reveal a great business getting better while quietly placing the largest bet in its history.

• Revenue growth (latest quarter): +22% YoY. Accelerating, not maturing.

• Operating margin: 36.1%. Elite and still expanding.

• Google Cloud growth: +63%. The credible second engine.

• ROIC: ~19.2%. Capital still works hard.

• Free cash flow (TTM): ~$64B. Compressing under the capex surge.

• Capex guidance (current year): $180-190B. The bet that defines the decade.

• EPS growth (10-year annual growth): 25%. Strong to say the least.

The top of this list is the story of a great business getting better: 22% growth at trillion-dollar scale is rare, and a 36% operating margin is the mark of a true franchise.

The bottom of the list is not weakness, it is conviction. Free cash flow compressed even as operating cash flow hit $174 billion, because management is plowing nearly everything back into AI infrastructure. That is what it looks like when a company with one of the best balance sheets on earth decides to press its advantage rather than coast on it.

Why the Best May Still Be Ahead

The lazy view treats Alphabet as a mature giant with nowhere left to grow. The evidence says the opposite. This is a company with multiple distinct engines that are each early in their own runway, and AI is the rocket fuel for all of them.

• Custom silicon is a structural edge. Google designs its own AI chips, called TPUs, which means it can train and run AI at a lower cost than rivals renting hardware from someone else. In an AI arms race defined by compute cost, owning the factory is a durable advantage.

• Cloud is still small and getting more profitable. At $20 billion a quarter against a market measured in trillions, Google Cloud has barely scratched its opportunity, and margins are expanding as it scales. The $462 billion backlog is years of revenue already under contract.

• Gemini turns billions of users into an AI distribution network. Most AI startups have to find users. Google already has them, across Search, Android, Chrome, Gmail, and Workspace, giving it instant reach to deploy AI at a scale no competitor can match.

• AI is expanding search, not eating it. Early fears said AI would kill the golden goose. Instead, management reports record search usage and 19% search revenue growth as AI Overviews roll out, evidence the pie is growing rather than shrinking.

• Waymo is a free option. Google’s self-driving unit is the clear leader in autonomous vehicles, a potentially enormous market that is barely reflected in today’s price.

• The smart money is buying in. Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway took a $10 billion stake in the recent capital raise, a notable vote of confidence from the most patient investor alive.

Put those together and the picture is not a company defending its turf. It is a company with the data, the chips, the distribution, and the balance sheet to compound for another decade.

The Moat (or Lack Thereof)

Alphabet’s moat is one of the widest in public markets, and it is not built on a single advantage. It is built on four pillars that reinforce each other.

• Scale advantage: few companies on earth can match Google’s global data centers, index, and distribution.

• Network effects: more users make Search and YouTube more valuable to advertisers, and more advertisers fund better products.

• Data flywheel: decades of query data train results that competitors cannot simply buy.

• Brand: Google is one of the only products whose name became the verb for the activity itself.

Stress-test that against the most credible threats and the moat holds up well. AI answer engines, including rivals like OpenAI, could in theory change the habit of searching, yet the early data cuts firmly in Google’s favor, with record usage and growing search revenue as its own AI features roll out. The franchise is not just surviving the transition, it is leading it.

The Bear Case

No honest analysis hides its risks, so here are the watchpoints that could challenge the thesis. None is a reason to look away today, but each is worth tracking.

1. AI could change search behavior. If users ever shift wholesale from searching to asking AI assistants that answer without ads, the core profit engine would feel it, though current data shows the opposite happening.

2. The courts remain a wildcard. A federal judge ruled Google an illegal monopolist, and the Department of Justice and 38 states are appealing for tougher remedies, including a possible Chrome divestiture that one estimate ties to $15 to $25 billion of ad revenue.

3. The capex bet has to pay off. Spending $180 to $190 billion a year, partly funded with new stock, is a large wager, and the return on that capital will take time to prove.

4. Advertising still dominates the mix. Despite real diversification, ads drive most of the profit, so the business is not yet fully insulated from a shock to that single pool.

The reassuring part: each risk is a known quantity that management is actively managing, not a hidden crack in the foundation.

The Verdict

This is a world class business with a fortress moat, elite returns on capital, and a candid, deeply aligned management team, and it joins the Stock Pickz list with real conviction.

The case is straightforward: Google has the data, the custom chips, the distribution, and the balance sheet to win the AI era rather than be erased by it. At roughly $350 and a P/E near 27, the stock sits near its ten-year average of 27, so the most disciplined approach is to buy with conviction and add aggressively on any weakness. The whole investment comes down to one line worth remembering: the market is still pricing Alphabet as a company defending a monopoly, when it is actually a company about to extend one.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always do your own due diligence before making any investment decision.

That framing is exactly wrong. What Nadella actually built is a toll road: quietly expanding, nearly impossible to avoid, sitting between every large enterprise on earth and the computing infrastructure it cannot function without. The question is not whether Microsoft is a great business. It is whether, at $3 trillion, the best of the story is already priced in, or whether AI means we are still in the early chapters.

Microsoft: The Company in Plain English

Microsoft Corporation designs, sells, and operates the software, cloud infrastructure, and AI tools that run modern business. Its three revenue segments are Productivity and Business Processes (Office, Teams, LinkedIn), Intelligent Cloud (Azure, server products), and More Personal Computing (Windows, Xbox, Search). The company earns money primarily through subscription licenses and cloud consumption fees, making it one of the largest recurring-revenue businesses in the world.

The Origin Story

Microsoft was founded in 1975 by Bill Gates and Paul Allen with a specific insight: software, not hardware, would become the scarce and valuable resource of the computing age. That insight produced a near-monopoly in operating systems and productivity software that persisted for decades. By the early 2010s, however, the company had calcified. Its culture was famously territorial, its mobile efforts were a disaster, and the cloud future was being built by Amazon while Microsoft’s leadership debated whether to protect its existing business.

Then came Satya Nadella. Appointed CEO in February 2014, Nadella made three decisions that changed everything: he declared Microsoft a cloud-first company, he dismantled the internal competition culture that had stifled innovation, and he made the audacious move of open-sourcing key Microsoft technologies and running Linux on Azure. These were not small pivots. They were the kind of decisions that require a CEO to be willing to be wrong in front of the whole world.

The insight that connects the origin story to the moat today is this: Microsoft’s original competitive advantage was control of the operating system, the layer of software through which all other software ran. Nadella understood that the cloud was the new operating system, and that Azure could occupy exactly the same structural position in the enterprise that Windows had occupied on the desktop. He was right.

How Microsoft Makes Money

Microsoft’s revenue engine has three distinct layers, each with its own pricing mechanism and growth profile.

Intelligent Cloud (~$106B in FY2025 revenue, growing ~33% YoY)

• Azure cloud services: Enterprises pay on a consumption model for compute, storage, networking, and AI workloads. The more AI models a customer runs, the more they spend. Revenue scales automatically with usage.

• Server products: On-premises versions of SQL Server, Windows Server, and related tools, sold via perpetual and subscription licenses. Slower growth but highly sticky.

Productivity and Business Processes (~$80-85B annually)

• Microsoft 365 commercial: Subscription licenses per user per month covering Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, and SharePoint. Near-100% renewal rates make this one of the most durable revenue streams in software.

• Copilot add-on: A $30 per user per month layer stacked on top of existing Microsoft 365 licenses, delivering AI-assisted features across the entire suite. Adoption is still early, but the margin profile on this add-on is exceptional.

• LinkedIn: A combination of talent solutions (recruiting), marketing solutions (B2B advertising), and premium subscriptions. Growing in the high single digits.

• Dynamics 365: Cloud-based business applications covering CRM and ERP functions, competing directly with Salesforce and SAP.

More Personal Computing (~$45-50B annually)

• Windows OEM licensing: PC manufacturers pay Microsoft for the right to ship Windows on their hardware. Mature and cyclical, tied to PC shipment volumes.

• Xbox and gaming: A mix of hardware sales, Game Pass subscriptions, and content revenue following the Activision Blizzard acquisition.

• Search and advertising: Bing and the Microsoft Advertising network, growing in the low-to-mid twenties on an ex-TAC basis.

The unit economics across the portfolio are exceptional, with company-wide gross margins near 69%. The Copilot add-on is the most important line item to watch: it represents essentially incremental margin on top of an already-installed base, and its adoption curve will be a primary driver of whether the current valuation is ultimately justified.

The Numbers That Matter

Microsoft's financials are, in most respects, a masterclass in capital efficiency and recurring revenue. The one exception is free cash flow, which is under deliberate pressure right now, and understanding why is central to the thesis.

• TTM Revenue: ~$318 billion. Scale creates a compounding distribution advantage that smaller competitors simply cannot match.

• Revenue Growth (FY2025): ~15% YoY. Decelerating at the total company level, but Azure is growing at 33-40%, which is where the real story lives.

• Gross Margin: ~69%. Top-quintile for any company at this scale, reflecting the high-margin software and cloud mix.

• TTM Operating Cash Flow: ~$170 billion. One of the highest OCF generators in corporate history, full stop.

• TTM Free Cash Flow: ~$73 billion. Compressed by the $97 billion capex surge. This is the single most important number to watch each quarter.

• ROIC: ~27%. Exceptional capital efficiency, well above cost of capital, and still improving.

• EV/FCF: ~38-43x. Rich. The current multiple requires the AI monetization thesis to play out. There is limited margin for disappointment here.

• Net Debt: ~$47 billion. Manageable given $170 billion in annual operating cash flow. Not a concern.

The FCF compression is the number worth watching most closely. Operating cash flow of $170 billion is extraordinary, but capex of $97 billion, more than double the level of two years ago, is the consequence of Microsoft’s bet on AI infrastructure.

The company is currently building the equivalent of a new railroad network, and free cash flow will remain compressed until those assets begin generating revenue at scale. Analysts estimate normalized FCF could reach $100-120 billion annually within two to three years if the AI revenue thesis plays out. That is the bull case arithmetic.

The Moat (or Lack Thereof)

Microsoft’s moat is not one thing. It is a stack of advantages that reinforce each other, and understanding the structure of that stack is the key to evaluating the durability of the thesis.

The primary moat is switching costs, and they are among the deepest in all of enterprise software. A large company running Microsoft 365 for 50,000 employees has embedded Teams into its communications, SharePoint into its document management, Azure Active Directory into its identity infrastructure, and Dynamics into its business operations. Replacing Microsoft is not a software decision. It is a multi-year organizational transformation project. The question is never “is there a cheaper option?” The question is “is the cheaper option worth two years of disruption?” Almost always, the answer is no.

The secondary moat sources are:

• Network effects via Teams and LinkedIn. Teams becomes more valuable as more of a company’s ecosystem joins. LinkedIn’s professional network has 1 billion members, and that data flywheel deepens every time a recruiter, salesperson, or executive logs in.

• Scale advantage in cloud. Azure’s global infrastructure footprint, approximately $205 billion in property and equipment as of the latest balance sheet, is not something any new entrant can replicate. Even well-funded hyperscalers took a decade to build comparable footprints.

• Brand premium in enterprise. “Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft” is an old joke but a durable commercial truth. The Microsoft brand reduces procurement risk perception in ways that translate into real pricing power.

The most credible competitive threats are:

1. Google Cloud, which is gaining enterprise share and has a compelling AI stack through Gemini, though its enterprise relationships remain thinner than Microsoft’s.

2. AWS, which is the market leader in cloud infrastructure and has not conceded that position despite slower recent growth.

3. Open-source AI models that commoditize the foundational AI layer, potentially undermining the value of the OpenAI partnership that differentiates Azure today.

The honest assessment: the moat is wide, but it is not inviolable. If Google Cloud continues to gain enterprise trust and AI capabilities converge toward commodity, Azure’s growth premium could compress over a 5-10 year horizon. That scenario is not the base case, but a disciplined investor acknowledges it.

The Bear Case

The bull case for Microsoft is well-understood by the market. The more useful exercise is to steel-man the skeptics.

1. The capex bet does not generate proportionate returns. Microsoft is spending roughly $97 billion in annual capex on AI infrastructure, up from approximately $44 billion in FY2024. If AI adoption cycles prove slower than anticipated, or if open-source models commoditize the AI infrastructure layer, those assets become a drag on returns rather than a growth engine. Free cash flow stays compressed, and the current EV/FCF multiple of 38-43x cannot be justified on normalized earnings.

2. Regulatory risk is underpriced. The EU has already moved against Microsoft’s bundling of Teams with Office, and similar actions in the U.S. and UK are possible. More importantly, Microsoft’s OpenAI relationship faces regulatory scrutiny. A forced structural change to how Microsoft bundles AI services could meaningfully impair the Copilot monetization thesis.

3. Insider selling is a behavioral signal worth noting. CEO Satya Nadella has sold over $360 million in stock via 10b5-1 plans in recent periods. Net insider transactions across all insiders are consistently negative with zero purchases. Insiders always have personal financial reasons for selling, and planned selling is not necessarily bearish, but the pattern is worth acknowledging rather than dismissing.

4. Copilot monetization is behind schedule. Enterprise adoption of the $30/user Copilot add-on has been slower than many early projections suggested. AI is reaching the productivity layer of most enterprises more gradually than the infrastructure layer, which means the high-margin revenue uplift may take longer to materialize than the capex spend required to support it.

The Verdict

Microsoft is a generational business operating at the center of the most important technology transition in a generation. The moat is real, the management track record under Nadella is exceptional, and the structural position in enterprise AI deployment is arguably unmatched in the industry.

The honest version of the bull case is that Microsoft is a business of such quality and structural advantage that paying a fair-to-full price for it, and compounding with it for a decade, is a better bet than waiting for a discount that may never arrive. For investors who believe the Copilot and Azure AI monetization story is in its early chapters, the current price, with the stock down roughly 7.5% over the past year on capex anxiety rather than thesis deterioration, represents a reasonable entry.

The best businesses in history never looked cheap at the right time to buy them, and Microsoft is making the case that this is one of those moments.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always do your own due diligence before making any investment decision.

The Founding Story

In 2015, Daniel Schreiber and Shai Wininger sat down to redesign insurance from scratch. Schreiber was a tech executive. Wininger had co-founded Fiverr. Neither had worked in insurance a day in their lives, and that was entirely the point.

What bothered them wasn’t the premiums. It was the conflict of interest baked into every traditional insurance company. Every dollar paid in claims is a dollar taken from profit. The incentive to deny is architectural. Customers know this, which is why insurance consistently ranks among the lowest-trust industries in the world.

Their answer was the Giveback model. Lemonade charges a flat 20% fee to cover operating costs. The rest pools for claims. Anything left at year-end goes to a charity of the customer’s choosing. Profit comes from fees and investment income, not from denying claims. The conflict is structurally removed.

They launched in New York in 2016, selling renters insurance at roughly a third of incumbent prices, with claims handled in minutes by AI. The product went viral in a way insurance never had before. Word spread that it actually worked.

By 2020, they were public on the NYSE. The stock soared, then crashed, along with every other high-growth name, as losses widened in 2022. At its trough, LMND traded below $12. In 2026, with losses narrowing sharply and growth accelerating, the story looks considerably more interesting again.

What Lemonade Does and How It Makes Money

Unlike most insurtechs, which are really just distribution middlemen, Lemonade is a full-stack carrier. It holds its own licenses, takes the underwriting risk, and pays the claims. It is a real insurance company. It just doesn’t look like one.

The experience is entirely app and web-based. A renters policy takes about 90 seconds. Claims are described in plain language, a photo is uploaded, and in straightforward cases, the AI approves and pays in minutes. The company once settled a claim in 3 seconds.

The product lineup spans renters, homeowners, pet, car (growing roughly 40% year-over-year, with a Tesla FSD partnership launched in 2026), term life, and a rapidly expanding European operation that grew in-force premium (IFP) by over 200% year-over-year.

The business model shifted significantly in mid-2025. Lemonade had historically ceded around 55% of premiums to reinsurers, keeping only 45% of the economics. Confident in its AI underwriting, it cut that cession to around 20%, retaining 80% of premium economics. That single shift is worth an estimated $30M in annual savings and has driven a step-change in reported margins. In Q1 2026, revenue grew 71% year-over-year to $258M, while gross profit jumped 159% to $100M.

Competitive Moat: A Real Edge, Still Being Sharpened

The moat is real but still maturing. Ten years of proprietary AI training data across underwriting, pricing, and claims is not something a competitor can replicate quickly. The AI improves claim selection accuracy by roughly 30%, and Lemonade has maintained a 3:1 LTV-to-CAC ratio even as marketing spend tripled. That is the signature of a machine getting smarter, not just bigger. An 85% annual dollar retention rate, improving year over year, is the most direct evidence of genuine customer stickiness.

The moat has structural breadth too: brand differentiation through the Giveback model, switching costs as customers bundle multiple products, and early-stage data network effects. What holds the score back is unproven pricing power. Lemonade has improved its economics through better underwriting, not through raising prices. There is also limited evidence of organic word-of-mouth growth at scale.

Management Quality: Founders Still in the Cockpit

Schreiber and Wininger have been co-CEOs for ten years. Founder-led, long-tenured, meaningfully equity-aligned, and not net sellers. But what distinguishes this management team most is the quality of their communication. Their shareholder letters are among the most candid in the sector. In 2022, they publicly set a target for adjusted EBITDA profitability by late 2026. In Q1 2026, they are tracking exactly to that timeline.

Capital discipline has been real. Non-growth operating expenses have been essentially flat for three years while the business doubled. The company reached $1M of IFP per employee in Q1 2026, nearly three times its 2022 figure. The primary gaps are an executive pay structure not clearly tied to long-term return targets, and insufficient data to confirm a strong internal culture rating.

Business Quality: The Model Works, Not Yet Confirmed

Insurance is a structurally attractive business model. Premiums are recurring, habitual, and paid upfront. Lemonade’s 85% annual dollar retention confirms that holds in practice. The gross margin trajectory is striking: from 19% in 2023 to 41% in Q3 2025 and 48% in Q4 2025. However, Q1 2026 slipped back to 39%, a reminder that quarterly margins in insurance are sensitive to loss timing and catastrophe events. The 40% threshold has not been confirmed as a consistent baseline yet.

The business will clearly exist and matter in ten years. AI-native insurance delivery will be more relevant in a decade, not less. What drags the score is the cash flow history. GAAP operating cash flow only turned positive in 2025, and capex discipline has not been confirmed across multiple years.

Growth Runway: The Market Is Enormous and Barely Touched

The strongest area of the analysis. The U.S. property and casualty market alone is roughly $900 billion. Lemonade’s $1.33 billion in IFP represents less than 0.2% penetration. The opportunity is not a concern. It is one of the most compelling parts of the thesis.

The runway has multiple distinct vectors: car insurance expanding state by state, European operations up over 200% year-over-year, pet insurance now the company’s largest line, and cross-sell bundling compounding with 18% of IFP now coming from bundled customers at near-zero acquisition cost. The Tesla autonomous vehicle partnership adds long-duration optionality. The one genuine risk is climate. Catastrophic weather is a structural headwind for homeowners underwriting that technology alone cannot fully solve.

Financials and Efficiency: The Numbers Have Not Caught Up Yet

This is where the analysis hits its hardest wall. Return on invested capital is -12%. Return on equity is -29%. These are not trivial misses. They indicate the company is still consuming capital faster than it generates returns on it, and a score this low is enough to cap the overall business grade regardless of how strong everything else looks.

Context matters. Five years ago, ROIC was -292%. Net loss in Q1 2026 was $36M versus $62M a year prior, while revenue grew 71%. EPS losses are narrowing fast. Revenue is growing while non-growth operating expenses decline. The AI leverage is real and visible in the numbers. But it takes more than a compelling trajectory. It takes confirmed, sustained positive returns. Positive adjusted EBITDA in Q4 2026 and GAAP profitability in 2027 are the milestones that will change this picture.

Entry Price and Value: Growth Already Priced In

At roughly $55, LMND trades at about 4.87x forward price-to-sales. Traditional insurers trade at 1-2x revenue. The premium the market is paying is an explicit bet that Lemonade becomes a technology company that sells insurance, not an insurance company that uses technology. The bull case requires sustained 30%+ growth and meaningful margin expansion over multiple years, leaving little room for error.

Two things temper the concern. The stock has already fallen roughly 45% from its 52-week high of $100, pricing out some of the earlier froth. And with no GAAP profits yet, anchoring a precise fair value requires so many assumptions that the exercise is more art than science. For a long-duration investor, valuation is the least important dimension here. The financial fundamentals are the real gating factor.

Final Verdict

Lemonade passes every qualitative test: credible founders, clean incentives, genuine product innovation, a massive market, and multiple visible growth vectors. It fails the primary quantitative test of sustained positive returns on invested capital. The weighted score of 62/100 puts it on the “Watchlist” for me. Until the company can improve its financials and efficiency, I’m sitting on the sidelines.

Great stories and great investments are not the same thing until the economics confirm each other.

For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.

And somewhere between a nearly $10 churro, a spontaneous five-minute Spider-Man street show that stopped the entire park in its tracks, and watching my kids completely lose their minds over characters they’ve been watching since they could sit up, I started thinking like an investor.

Not about the magic. But, about the moat. Is The Walt Disney Company (NYSE: DIS) a good long-term stock investment? Here’s a deep dive.

What I Saw at the Park

Let me paint the picture.

Disneyland was packed. Not “busy for a Tuesday” packed. Packed packed. Thousands of families, many of them paying $150+ per person just to walk through the gate, then immediately opening their wallets again for food, Lightning Lane passes, merchandise, and photos.

I personally spent over $500 on food alone for my family over two days.

And here’s the kicker: nobody around me seemed bothered by the high priced food. Because that’s what Disney does. It doesn’t feel like being milked. It feels like being part of something. There’s a reason Disneyland ticket prices have increased from $76 in 2010 to up to $224 per person in 2026, and the parks are still full.

That’s pricing power. And pricing power is what Buffett has always said separates a great business from a good one.

The real-time performance at the park is genuinely world-class. Not just the rides, the experience. Costumed characters appearing out of nowhere. Impromptu shows in the middle of the street. Parades timed to the minute. Stage productions that would cost a fortune anywhere else are just...included.

The level of creativity, engineering, and theatrical execution on display in that park is unlike anything else in consumer entertainment. Competitors have tried for decades to replicate it, but nobody has come close.

How Disney Actually Makes Money

Disney is one of the most diversified entertainment businesses ever built. It owns the following brands and assets, of which I’d bet almost everyone reading uses regularly:

• Walt Disney Studios

• Pixar Animation

• Marvel Studios

• Lucasfilm (Star Wars)

• 20th Century Studios

• Searchlight Pictures

• ESPN, ABC, FX Networks, National Geographic

• Disney+

• Hulu

• Movies Anywhere

• Disneyland Resort California

• Walt Disney World Florida

• Disneyland Paris

• Disney Cruise Line

• Hong Kong Disneyland

The revenue breakdown:

Experiences (Parks, Cruises, Consumer Products): Disney’s biggest profit engine. In fiscal 2025, the Experiences segment generated $36.2 billion in revenue, up 6% year over year. Domestic parks operating income grew 22% in Q3 FY2025 alone, and then another 5% in Q2 2026. The cruise line is expanding. A new theme park in Abu Dhabi has been announced. This business prints money when it’s running well.

Entertainment (Streaming + Film + TV): Disney+ and Hulu combined now have 196+ million subscribers. After years of losses, streaming turned profitable, posting $582 million in operating income in Q2 FY2026. The film studio behind Marvel, Pixar, Lucasfilm (Star Wars), and Walt Disney Animation remains one of the most powerful content machines in history.

Sports (ESPN): A $17+ billion revenue segment. The pivot to streaming via ESPN+ is underway, and while the traditional linear TV business faces secular headwinds, ESPN’s sports rights portfolio remains enormously valuable.

The IP Flywheel: This is what most investors miss. Every movie Disney makes spawns merchandise, theme park rides, Disney+ content, and character experiences. “Inside Out 2” doesn’t just gross $1.5 billion at the box office. It sells toys. It fills park queues. It drives streaming subscribers. It’s a vertically integrated money machine that compounds across every business unit.

Marvel. Pixar. Star Wars. Disney Classics. Each one is a standalone franchise worth billions, all under one roof.

The Bull Case: The Greatest Brand in Consumer Entertainment

Peter Lynch built his philosophy around investing in what you know and understand. He called it the “cocktail party theory.” When your kids are obsessed with something, pay attention.

Disney has done something almost no company in history has pulled off: it has owned childhood for decades. Generation after generation grows up with Disney characters, Disney songs, and Disney memories. Then they grow up, have their own kids, and bring them to Disneyland. That emotional loop is not replicable. It is not acquirable. And it doesn’t show up cleanly in a DCF model.

Adults at Disneyland make up a massive percentage of park traffic, many of them there without children at all, whether you like it or not. Plenty of people well into their 40s and 50s still have the tattoos, the annual passes, and the full costumes to prove it. That’s more than just nostalgia. That’s brand loyalty at the deepest level.

The financial recovery is real. Revenue has grown from $88.9B in FY2023 to $94.4B in FY2025. Operating income is up 18% over the same period. Streaming went from bleeding cash to generating profit. The Experiences segment is posting record numbers. Free cash flow hit $10 billion in FY2025, up nearly 18% year over year.

The stock, meanwhile, sits around $105, down roughly 46% from its 2021 all-time high of $197.

That’s the kind of disconnect Lynch paid attention to. A world-class business at a significant discount to its peak.

The Bear Case: Where the Story Gets Complicated

The Buffett lens asks a different question: what could go wrong?

Content missteps cost real money. When Disney’s films underperform, the entire flywheel slows: box office, streaming, park queues, and merchandise all take a hit. The live-action Snow White remake was a visible reminder that the brand is not bulletproof when it drifts from what made it iconic.

Linear TV is in structural decline. ESPN and ABC face the same cord-cutting problem as every legacy broadcaster, with linear cable operating income falling 14% year over year. It’s a drag on the business and will remain one for the foreseeable future.

The new CEO is unproven. Josh D’Amaro, Disney’s former parks chief, took over in March 2026 with Wall Street’s cautious blessing. Disney’s last CEO transition (Chapek to Iger) sent the stock from $200 to $85, and that scar is fresh.

Debt from the Fox acquisition lingers. The $71 billion Fox deal left Disney carrying significant net debt, limiting financial flexibility heading into an uncertain macro environment.

Parks are macro-sensitive. The Experiences segment is Disney’s best business right now, but it’s also deeply tied to consumer discretionary spending. During the 2008 recession, park operating income fell 25% in a single year.

Streaming competition is brutal. Disney+ is now profitable, but it’s fighting Netflix, Amazon, and Apple for the same wallet. Subscriber growth has been modest, and pricing power has real limits when canceling takes two clicks.

Walt’s Standard: The Real Test

Here’s the thesis in plain terms.

Walt Disney built this company on a simple idea: create experiences that make people feel something. Joy. Wonder. Belonging. He believed in quality above everything. His parks were obsessively maintained. His films were crafted with care. His brand stood for something specific.

When Disney drifted from that standard over the past several years, the market noticed and the stock reflected it.

But here’s what’s encouraging: the pivot back appears to be underway. Recent box office performances like “Inside Out 2” and “Deadpool & Wolverine” show the creative engine can still fire. Park performance is at record levels. Streaming is profitable. Leadership seems more focused on returning to the storytelling fundamentals that made the brand great.

If Disney continues to produce films that children fall in love with, that their parents want to watch with them, and that end up as rides, merchandise, and streaming content, the flywheel reaccelerates. And that flywheel, once spinning at full speed, is one of the most durable business models in consumer entertainment.

The Verdict: On the Radar, Not the Buy List. Yet.

Disney is not a classic deep-value stock. It’s not trading at distressed multiples. The concerns around content quality and linear TV are real.

But this is a business with a legitimate moat, a globally dominant brand, a parks operation that demonstrated pricing power in real time when I watched it empty my wallet and keep me smiling, and a content library that has outlasted every attempt to compete with it.

The product is exceptional. The question is execution.

For Disney to earn a spot on the buy list, I want to see continued evidence that content quality is returning to its historic standard and that it is producing films that kids and families genuinely love, grounded in traditional family values we all know and love.

I want to see streaming margins improve further. And I want to see the parks business sustain its momentum as consumer spending normalizes.

When those boxes are checked, a $105 stock that once traded at $197 starts looking like a compelling long-term opportunity.

Walt Disney built something truly irreplaceable. If the people running it today remember that, the stock will take care of itself.

The magic is still there. The question is whether management is committed to protecting it.

Not “what’s the upside?” Not “what’s the growth rate?”

The question is simpler and far more powerful:

Is this business inevitable?

Meaning: Could this company still dominate its industry 20 years from now, even if a well-funded competitor tried everything to take it down?

If the answer is yes, you might have something worth owning for a long time.

If the answer is “maybe” or “it depends,” that’s worth understanding before you put real money to work.

Here’s how to find out.

What Buffett Actually Means by a “Moat”

Buffett didn’t invent competitive advantage. But he gave it a name that stuck.

He calls it an economic moat. It’s the business equivalent of the water surrounding a castle. The wider the moat, the harder it is for competitors to get in. The deeper it is, the more painful it is to try.

His exact words from a 1995 Berkshire shareholder meeting:

“What is keeping that castle standing? And what’s going to keep it standing — or cause it not to be standing — five, ten, twenty years from now?”

That’s the whole framework. Everything else is just detail.

The 6 Fundamentals to Look For

Before you buy, run any stock through these six filters. They’re not magic. But they separate durable businesses from ones that just look good in a bull market.

1. Pricing Power

Can the company raise prices without losing customers?

This is the single biggest signal of a durable business. Companies without pricing power are at the mercy of inflation, competition, and economic cycles. Companies with it can pass costs along and protect their margins.

The test: Has gross margin stayed stable or improved over the last 5–10 years, even during downturns?

Classic example: Coca-Cola has raised prices repeatedly for decades. People still buy it. That’s pricing power. Compare that to a commodity airline. The moment a competitor drops fares, customers switch tonight.

2. Switching Costs

How painful is it for a customer to leave?

The best businesses make leaving feel like a root canal. Not because they’re trapping customers, but because they’ve become so embedded in how people work and live that switching is genuinely expensive.

The test: Would a customer have to retrain staff, migrate years of data, or rebuild workflows to switch providers?

Classic example: Microsoft Office. Businesses have been using Excel and Word for 30 years. The switching cost is more painful than any fee. It’s thousands of hours of retraining and migration. That’s a moat. A wide one.

3. Network Effects

Does the product become more valuable as more people use it?

This is the rarest and most powerful moat type. When every new user makes the product better for existing users, growth compounds the advantage, and competitors face an almost impossible task of replicating it from scratch.

The test: Does the product’s value depend on the size of its user base?

Classic example: Visa. Every new cardholder makes Visa more attractive to merchants. Every new merchant makes Visa more valuable to cardholders. No startup can replicate that network because it took decades to build.

4. Is Return on Equity (ROE) Consistently Above 15%?

This is where the moat shows up in the numbers.

ROE measures how much profit a company generates relative to shareholder equity. A consistently high ROE above 15% over five or more years is one of the strongest signals that a real competitive advantage exists.

The test: Pull up 5–10 years of ROE. Is it consistent? Or does it spike in good years and collapse in bad ones?

Classic example: Apple’s ROE has been well above 100% in recent years, which is a reflection of its brand power, ecosystem lock-in, and pricing authority all compounding together. That’s not luck. That’s a moat.

5. Free Cash Flow — The One Number That Doesn’t Lie

Revenue can be massaged. Earnings can be adjusted. Free cash flow is harder to fake.

It tells you whether the business actually generates real money after paying for the things it needs to keep running. Buffett has said he looks for businesses that generate strong free cash flow without requiring constant reinvestment just to stay competitive.

The test: Is free cash flow growing year over year? Is it being used to buy back shares, pay dividends, or build the business? Not just keep the lights on?

Classic example: A great business like Visa generates enormous free cash flow because it doesn’t need factories, inventory, or constant R&D just to maintain its position. A bad business generates revenue but burns it all on reinvestment to survive.

6. The 10-Year Competitor Test

This one is qualitative, but don’t skip it.

Imagine a well-funded, intelligent competitor shows up tomorrow with unlimited capital and a mission to destroy this company. What happens?

If your answer is “they’d probably win eventually”, that’s a red flag. If your answer is “they’d spend billions and still fail”, that’s a moat.

The test: What would it actually take to replicate this company’s advantage? Patents? 50 years of brand building? A global network of 100 million users? The harder the answer, the better.

Classic example: Could a competitor build a better search engine than Google? Technically, maybe. But Google’s advantage is massive. It’s 25 years of data, user habits, and advertiser relationships are almost impossible to replicate from scratch.

Why This Matters More Than Ever Right Now

In a market full of AI hype and 80x earnings multiples, it’s tempting to chase growth.

But the investors who compound wealth over decades aren’t the ones who found the hottest trade. They’re the ones who never got wiped out.

That starts with a simple question before every purchase:

Is this business inevitable, or just popular?

Buffett put it plainly: “The key to investing is determining the competitive advantage of any given company, and above all, the durability of that advantage.”

Run the checklist. Know what you own. That alone puts you ahead of most retail investors.

The best investments don’t feel exciting. They feel obvious…in retrospect. Find the ones that are obvious right now.

They’re wrong.

Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) stopped being an online bookstore 25 years ago. It stopped being an e-commerce play about 10 years ago. Today, it is something most investors still haven’t fully priced in: a basket of six distinct, high-quality businesses wrapped inside a single ticker. Several of which would be Fortune 500 companies on their own.

And it’s one of the best-positioned enterprises on the planet for the AI boom.

Right now, for the first time in years, it’s trading at a valuation that might actually make sense.

Let’s get into it.

The Business: Not a Company. A Portfolio.

Peter Lynch had a gift for seeing businesses as they actually are, not what they’re labeled as.

If Lynch looked at Amazon today, he wouldn’t call it a retailer. He’d call it what it actually is: six businesses hiding under one ticker symbol. Each one is a mature, cash-generating, and growing business.

Here’s the full breakdown of how Amazon made its $716.9 billion in 2025 revenue:

Business #1: Online Stores

(~37% of revenue | ~$269B)

This is the original engine. Amazon’s first-party marketplace, where Amazon buys products and sells them directly to you. It’s not the fastest-growing segment, but it’s the foundation on which everything else is built. It drives traffic. It trains the algorithms. It anchors Prime membership. Think of it as the loss leader that makes every other business more valuable.

Business #2: Third-Party Seller Services

(~25% of revenue | ~$175B)

Here’s a stat most people don’t know: third-party sellers now account for 62% of all units sold on Amazon. Sure, Amazon sells products. But it also sells access to its platform, collecting commissions, fulfillment fees, and storage fees from over a million independent merchants. This business alone generated roughly $175 billion in 2025.

For context, that’s more than the entire annual revenue of Nike, Starbucks, and McDonald’s combined. Amazon collects a toll on every transaction without owning the inventory.

Business #3: Amazon Web Services (AWS)

(~18% of revenue | ~$129B, ~60% of operating income)

This is where the real money lives.

AWS is the dominant cloud infrastructure platform on Earth, holding roughly 29–30% global market share, exceeding that of Microsoft Azure (~20%) and Google Cloud (~13%). In 2025, AWS generated $128.7 billion in revenue, growing 20% year-over-year, with a 35%+ operating margin.

Think about that for a second. A $129 billion revenue business growing 20% annually at 35% margins. That’s not a division. That’s one of the most valuable standalone businesses in the world; it just happens to be buried inside Amazon’s quarterly report.

AWS represents only 18% of total revenue but generates roughly 60% of all operating income. That math tells you everything.

Business #4: Advertising Services

(~10% of revenue | ~$68.5B)

This is the stealth weapon most investors still underestimate.

Amazon Advertising is now the third-largest digital ad platform on Earth, trailing only Google and Meta. The full-year 2025 advertising revenue hit $68.5 billion and growing nearly 22% year-over-year. In Q4 alone, it generated $21.3 billion.

Here’s the key insight: Amazon’s ads are the most valuable ads in digital media. Google shows you ads when you search. Meta shows you ads while you scroll. Amazon shows you ads when you’re already in the checkout mindset. Purchase intent is the holy grail of advertising. Amazon owns it at scale.

With Prime Video ads now reaching 315 million viewers across 16 countries, this is a media business on top of a commerce business on top of a data business. The margin profile rivals pure software.

Business #5: Subscription Services

(~7% of revenue | ~$49B)

Amazon Prime is one of the greatest subscription businesses ever built. With 260 million members worldwide (185 million in the U.S. alone), Prime bundles free shipping, video streaming, music, photo storage, gaming, and grocery discounts into a single annual fee. The churn rate is remarkably low. Once you’re in the Prime ecosystem, leaving feels expensive even when it isn’t.

Prime Video alone had 240 million viewers in 2025. Amazon spent $22.4 billion on content to keep them there. That’s a content budget that rivals Netflix, and it’s subsidized by the e-commerce flywheel.

Business #6: Physical Stores

(~3% of revenue | ~$21B)

Whole Foods. Amazon Fresh. Amazon Go. This is Amazon’s brick-and-mortar footprint, and it’s quietly becoming a grocery powerhouse. Over 150 million Americans now consider Amazon a primary grocery destination, with same-day perishable delivery expanding rapidly.

Amazon is consolidating around Whole Foods and a new “supercenter” concept to go head-to-head with Walmart in the one retail category that still drives daily physical traffic. Small as a percentage today. Strategically important tomorrow.

The Numbers: Hard to Argue With

• Full-year 2025 revenue: $716.9 billion (+12% YoY)

• Full-year 2025 net income: $77.7 billion (+31% YoY)

• AWS Q4 2025 growth: 24% (the fastest growth in 13 quarters)

• AWS annualized run rate: $142 billion

• AWS backlog: $244 billion (+40% YoY). This is future locked-in revenue

• Operating cash flow: $139.5 billion (+20% YoY)

• Advertising revenue Q4 2025: $21.3 billion (+22% YoY)

• Prime Video ad-supported audience: 315 million viewers across 16 countries

• Trainium AI chips: triple-digit YoY growth, 100,000+ companies using them

These aren’t startup numbers. This is a mature, multi-segment machine that’s accelerating. Not slowing down.

Amazon’s AI Positioning: The Picks-and-Shovels Play of the Decade

Here’s what separates Amazon’s AI story from the rest of the hype cycle:

Amazon doesn’t need to win the AI race. It needs to host it.

Think about the California Gold Rush. The people who got rich weren’t necessarily the miners. They were the ones selling picks, shovels, and denim pants. Amazon, through AWS, is the largest single supplier of picks and shovels to the AI economy, and it’s locking in customers for a decade at a time.

Here’s how each piece of the AI strategy fits together:

Layer 1: The Infrastructure (AWS + Custom Silicon)

Every major AI company (OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Adobe, Salesforce, Perplexity, DoorDash, the NBA, the U.S. Air Force) is signing enterprise agreements with AWS. CEO Andy Jassy named them all on the last earnings call. It’s a who’s-who of every sector in the economy.

The deeper story is Amazon’s custom silicon. Instead of buying Nvidia GPUs at a premium, Amazon is building its own:

• Trainium2: 1M+ chips deployed, training models at scale, including for Anthropic.

• Trainium3: Just launched, 40% better price performance than T2. Nearly all supply committed by mid-2026.

• Trainium4: Already in development.

• Graviton: 100,000+ customers. Meta just signed on to deploy tens of millions of cores for its agentic AI workloads.

It’s Apple’s M-chip playbook applied to AI infrastructure. Own the silicon, own the margin, own the moat.

Layer 2: The Anthropic Partnership, Amazon’s OpenAI Bet

Amazon has now committed up to $25 billion in total investment into Anthropic, the AI safety company behind the Claude family of models, and one of the most credible frontier AI labs in the world.

In return, Anthropic has committed to spending more than $100 billion on AWS technologies over the next 10 years, training and running its models exclusively on Trainium and Graviton chips. AWS is Anthropic’s primary cloud provider for all mission-critical workloads, including safety research and future model development.

This is a structural lock-in. The more powerful Claude becomes, the more Trainium capacity Anthropic needs. The more Trainium capacity Anthropic needs, the more AWS revenue grows. Anthropic is currently on a $5 billion annualized revenue run rate and growing fast.

And this is just one customer.

Layer 3: Amazon Bedrock, The Enterprise AI Platform

Amazon Bedrock is AWS’s managed AI service that gives enterprise customers access to a curated menu of the world’s best AI models, including Claude (Anthropic), Llama (Meta), Mistral, and Amazon’s own Nova model family, all through a single, secure API.

Bedrock is already a multi-billion dollar annualized run rate business with customer spend growing 60% quarter-over-quarter. The genius of Bedrock is that Amazon doesn’t have to pick the winning AI model. It hosts all of them. When enterprises build on Bedrock, they’re building on AWS infrastructure. Amazon wins regardless of which model they choose.

Layer 4: AI Inside the Retail Business (Rufus + Alexa+)

The AI story extends beyond the cloud. It’s driving measurable revenue in Amazon’s consumer business.

Rufus (AI shopping assistant) was used by 300M+ customers in 2025, generating nearly $12B in incremental annualized sales. Users are 60% more likely to complete a purchase. On Black Friday 2025, AI-assisted sessions ending in a purchase more than doubled vs. the prior month; non-AI sessions grew just 20%. Rufus runs on Anthropic’s Claude and Amazon’s Nova models, meaning Amazon’s AI investment directly drives retail conversion.

Alexa+ users engage twice as often as with the original, and shopping conversations ending in a purchase are up 4x. Four new Echo devices ship natively with Alexa+, putting agentic AI into hundreds of millions of homes.

AI for sellers: 1.3M+ third-party sellers now use Amazon’s gen-AI tools to write listings, optimize pricing, and manage ads. Every efficiency gain increases platform volume and Amazon’s fee revenue.

The AI Summary

Amazon’s AI position is unique because it operates on every level of the stack simultaneously:

• At the infrastructure layer: AWS is the dominant cloud, with custom silicon reducing dependency on Nvidia

• At the platform layer: Bedrock hosts every major AI model and gives enterprises a single on-ramp to AI

• At the application layer: Rufus, Alexa+, and AI seller tools drive measurable revenue today

• At the investment layer: Anthropic gives Amazon a strategic stake in one of the top-two frontier AI labs in the world

Most AI companies are competing on one layer. But Amazon is compounding across all four.

The Bull Case: A Flywheel Built for the AI Era

The optimistic case isn’t complicated. It’s just compounding across six businesses, all reinforcing each other.

The capex is a feature, not a bug. $200 billion in planned 2026 capital expenditures sounds alarming until you realize the $244 billion AWS backlog represents signed contracts waiting to be fulfilled. Amazon is building a toll road and the traffic is already booked.

Advertising is still misunderstood. Most investors price Amazon as retail with a cloud division attached. The $68.5 billion advertising business (growing 22%+ at software-like margins) barely registers in their models.

The six-business structure is itself a moat. AWS profits fund retail price leadership. Retail data powers advertising. Advertising funds content. Content locks in Prime. Prime drives more AWS enterprise deals. No competitor can replicate the full system, only pieces of it. And pieces aren’t enough.

The Concerns: What Munger Would Ask

Munger’s inversion rule: “Tell me where I’m going to die, so I don’t go there.”

1. Free cash flow has cratered. With $200 billion in 2026 capex, trailing FCF has dropped to $11.2 billion, down from $38 billion in 2024. The bet is that AWS capacity monetizes as fast as it’s installed. It has historically. But this level of spending leaves no room for error.

2. AWS is losing market share, slowly. At 29–30%, AWS still leads. But it was 33% two years ago. Azure’s OpenAI integration is creating real enterprise stickiness. The margin of dominance is narrowing, even if the absolute lead remains large.

3. Retail margins are structurally thin. North American retail runs at 3–6% margins. Same-day delivery expansion and the new Amazon Leo satellite program (~$1 billion in added 2026 costs) keep pressure on. The profitability story requires AWS and advertising to keep outrunning retail costs. So far, so good, but it requires watching.

4. Valuation demands execution. At ~35x trailing and ~33x forward earnings, there’s no margin of safety in the price. Amazon’s 5-year average P/E was ~48x, so today is relatively cheap by historical standards, but this is still a stock you’re buying on confidence in execution, not cheapness.

The Verdict: This Is the Stock Pickz Buy

Here’s the honest summary:

Amazon is not cheap. It never is.

But what you’re buying at today’s price is meaningfully different from what you were buying three years ago at the same multiple. Back then, Amazon was a company trying to prove its profitability story. Today, that story is proven: $77 billion in net income, $139 billion in operating cash flow, and an AWS segment growing faster than it did a year ago.

The valuation has compressed significantly. Amazon’s forward P/E of ~33x is the lowest it’s been in nearly a decade. Earnings are compounding. The AWS backlog of $244 billion (+40% YoY) means we can see future revenue with unusual clarity.

The flywheel is intact. Retail → Prime → Advertising → AWS. These aren’t separate businesses. They reinforce each other. Every new Prime member makes the advertising platform more valuable. Every ad dollar funds infrastructure. Every infrastructure dollar makes AWS better. This is what Buffett means by a moat: not a wall, but a system that gets harder to compete with over time.

The AI tailwind is real. AWS is the infrastructure layer of the AI economy. Whether the winners of the AI race are OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or companies we haven’t heard of yet, almost all of them are building on cloud infrastructure. AWS is the dominant provider. Amazon wins as the picks-and-shovels play regardless of which AI model wins.

This is a buy for long-term investors with a 5-10 year horizon.

Disclosure: This newsletter is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always do your own research before making investment decisions.

At its IPO in December 2020, one analyst called it “the most ridiculous IPO of 2020.” The company had lost $667 million in 2019, operated in a brutally competitive industry, and had no clear path to profitability.

Fast forward to today: DoorDash commands over 60% of the U.S. food delivery market, operates across 40+ countries, generated nearly $14 billion in revenue in 2025, and posted $935 million in GAAP net income, proving the economics actually work.

The question now isn’t whether DoorDash can survive. It’s whether it can build something durable.

The Business: Delivery Was Just the Entry Point

At its core, DoorDash is a three-sided marketplace connecting consumers, merchants, and Dashers (delivery drivers). But wise investors would tell you to look past the surface.

What DoorDash is actually building is a local commerce platform. The infrastructure layer for anything moving from a merchant to a consumer quickly. Restaurants were just the beachhead. Today, about 30% of U.S. monthly active users order from non-restaurant categories: groceries, alcohol, pharmacy items, and retail goods. The more use cases it owns, the stickier it becomes.

How it makes money: Merchant commissions (15–30% per order) drive roughly 55–60% of revenue. DashPass subscriptions at $9.99/month and 22+ million members generate recurring, predictable revenue Buffett would appreciate. Advertising (merchants paying for promoted placements) doubled year over year and is becoming a high-margin engine that most investors are underpricing.

The Amazon playbook: build the marketplace, then sell access to it.

The Growth: Proving the Bears Wrong

DoorDash’s revenue growth and net income growth don’t lie. Take a look at the numbers:

Revenue grew 4.7x since the IPO. Net income swung from deep losses to nearly a billion dollars, a 660% jump in a single year. Total orders crossed $100 billion annualized globally. The stock, meanwhile, pulled back nearly 45% from its October 2025 high of ~$285, then recently resumed its uptrend from its low.

The business is quietly becoming what the bears said it couldn’t be.

The Bull Case

I love to see obvious businesses in large markets that are hard to replicate. DoorDash is starting to check those boxes.

The U.S. flywheel is real: more orders → more Dasher supply → faster delivery times → more consumers → more orders. That virtuous cycle has widened the gap against Uber Eats and Grubhub, not narrowed it.

The international opportunity is large. The 2025 acquisition of Deliveroo for ~$3.85 billion now puts DoorDash across 40+ countries, serving more than 1 billion people. Food delivery penetration in Europe and Asia trails the U.S. significantly — that’s runway, not saturation.

The path to $25B+ in revenue by 2029 doesn’t require heroic assumptions. At 28% growth in 2025, the trajectory is credible.

The Bear Case

Munger always asked: “Tell me where I’m going to die, so I don’t go there.”

The moat question is the big one. DoorDash’s advantages (scale, brand, DashPass loyalty) are real but not invincible. Unlike a Coca-Cola or a toll bridge, DoorDash is fighting for every order in a commoditized category. If Uber Eats offers a better deal tonight, you switch tonight.

Capital intensity is a concern. Buffett avoids businesses requiring constant reinvestment just to stay competitive. DoorDash is guiding for several hundred million dollars of incremental 2026 investment to integrate three platforms (DoorDash, Wolt, Deliveroo) and scale autonomous delivery, on top of the $3.85B already spent on Deliveroo. UBS recently downgraded DASH for exactly this reason: synergies are being reinvested rather than flowing to shareholders.

Valuation is unforgiving. At roughly 85-90x earnings, the stock is priced for perfect execution. Any stumble, such as integration delays, consumer spending slowdowns, competitive fee pressure, and the multiple compresses fast.

Regulatory headwinds won’t go away. Gig worker classification battles in California, the EU, and Australia all add operating cost risk that’s difficult to model. Not existential, but a recurring tax on margins that a truly wide-moat business wouldn’t face.

The Verdict: Watchlist, Not Buy List

DoorDash is not a classic Buffett stock. It requires ongoing capital investment, operates in a competitive marketplace, and trades at a premium multiple that leaves little margin for error.

But here’s the tension: the stock is down 33% from its highs while the business accelerated. Revenue grew 28%. Profits surged 660%. That kind of disconnect between stock price and business performance is exactly what Lynch told investors to pay attention to.

The question is whether the investments being made today (the global platform, autonomous delivery, the advertising engine) will produce something more defensible tomorrow. If yes, this is a compounder. If no, you’re paying a growth multiple for a logistics company without a true moat.

My take: The business has earned credibility. The stock, after the pullback, is becoming interesting. But before this makes the buy list, I want to see the Deliveroo integration execute cleanly, margins improve on a sustained basis, and the advertising business scaling faster than the market appreciates.

When those boxes start getting checked, that’s when this becomes a real conversation.

The story isn’t over. It’s just entering its most important chapter.

The Iran conflict. Oil near $100 a barrel. The Strait of Hormuz. A ceasefire that feels fragile. Retail investors moving to cash. Financial media playing its favorite game: catastrophizing.

And somewhere in the middle of all this noise, Warren Buffett’s most famous rule is being put to the test. Again.

“Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful.”

He wrote those words in a 2008 New York Times op-ed as the global financial system was in freefall. At the time, the advice seemed almost reckless. In hindsight, it was the most important investing memo of the decade.

Today, fear is back.

The question is: what does history actually say about investing when it is?

This Is Not a New Story

Every generation of investors believes “this crisis is different.”

“This time, the damage will be permanent. This time, the market won’t bounce back.” We’ve all heard it.

It is a very human instinct. And it is almost always wrong.

Since World War II, the list of crises is long: Pearl Harbor. The Korean War. The Cuban Missile Crisis. The Gulf War. September 11. Each time, it felt like the world might actually end.

Each time, it didn’t.

According to historical analysis by LPL Research, the S&P 500 has experienced an average decline of roughly 5% following geopolitical shocks, with markets typically bottoming in about three weeks and recovering within one to two months.

Three weeks. That is the average time it takes for the market to process a major geopolitical crisis and start recovering.

Think about that the next time you are tempted to hit sell.

The Numbers You Actually Need to See

Let’s go deeper, because the data here is more compelling than most investors realize.

Since 1980, the S&P 500 has delivered an average return of over 11% in the 12 months following major geopolitical shocks.

And, specifically in armed conflict, research found that the S&P 500 was up approximately 24.9% on average in the year following every war the U.S. was directly involved in since World War II.

Read that number again.

Up nearly 25%, on average, in the year after a conflict began.

Not every war. Not every crisis. But the broad pattern is overwhelming: investors who stayed the course were rewarded. The ones who sold in panic locked in losses and missed the recovery.

A few examples that stick:

During the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, as the U.S. and Soviet Union stood at the brink of nuclear war, the S&P 500 fell about 7% in the first few trading days. Once the crisis de-escalated, markets recovered those losses in just over two weeks.

After September 11, 2001, U.S. markets were closed for several days. When trading resumed, the S&P 500 dropped about 11% in the first week. Within roughly a month, the losses were fully recovered.

The pattern is consistent. And it is hard to ignore.

The One Exception Worth Knowing

No honest analysis leaves out the bear case.

There is one historical episode that breaks the pattern. And it is directly relevant to what is happening today.

The Arab oil embargo of 1973.

J.P. Morgan’s research found the 12-month real S&P 500 return after that shock was deeply negative, approximately 37% down in real terms over the following year.

Why was 1973 different? Because the oil shock was not temporary. Supply stayed tight for years. The result was stagflation: high inflation paired with deteriorating economic growth. Oil prices essentially stopped the economy from functioning efficiently for nearly a decade.

That is the real risk investors need to be watching right now. Not the war itself. Not the headlines. But whether this becomes a sustained energy shock, or whether supply normalizes.

The ceasefire is fragile. The IEA has warned that April supply disruptions could exceed March’s. Brent crude is still near bouncing between $100 and $110.

The bull case depends on the conflict staying short. The bear case is a drawn-out war that keeps oil elevated long enough to bite into corporate margins and consumer spending.

The key distinction, as J.P. Morgan puts it, is a fast spike that fades versus a sustained rise that tightens financial conditions. Sustained oil strength acts like a tax on consumers, pushes inflation expectations higher, and increases pressure on central banks.

That is how geopolitics can become macro.

But Here Is What the Market Is Telling You Right Now

Here is the part most investors are missing.

Even with a war in the Middle East, even with oil elevated, even with a fragile ceasefire and real uncertainty, the underlying fundamentals of Corporate America look remarkably strong.

According to FactSet, the S&P 500 is projected to report earnings growth of 13.2% for Q1 2026. If that holds, it will mark the sixth consecutive quarter of double-digit year-over-year earnings growth.

Six straight quarters of double-digit earnings growth. During a war.

BlackRock added that technology profits are expected to grow 45% this year, yet the sector has barely moved. That has pushed tech valuations to their lowest relative level since mid-2020.

This is what Buffett and Peter Lynch have always said: stock prices are driven by fear and greed in the short term, but by earnings in the long term. When fear pushes prices down while earnings stay strong, that is the definition of an opportunity.

Morgan Stanley summarized it cleanly this week: accelerating earnings are protecting the S&P 500 from deeper losses.

The market is volatile. The businesses behind it are still growing.

What Buffett Would Actually Do

Here is the honest truth about Buffett’s famous quote: it is easy to repeat and hard to act on.

When he wrote those words in 2008, he was not just dispensing advice. He was buying. Aggressively. He wrote:

“I’ve been buying American stocks. This is my personal account I’m talking about, in which I previously owned nothing but United States government bonds. If prices keep looking attractive, my non-Berkshire net worth will soon be 100 percent in United States equities.”

He put his money where his mouth was. At the scariest possible moment.

But there is an important nuance that gets lost in the retelling.

Buffett was not buying everything. He was buying quality. Businesses with durable earnings, real competitive advantages, and the ability to survive whatever came next. As he has said before, whether socks or stocks, buy quality merchandise when it is marked down.

The same principle applies today.

This is not a moment to panic sell. But it is also not a moment to buy blindly. It is a moment to be selective.

Peter Lynch called this knowing the story. Before you add to any position in a volatile market, ask yourself one question: do I understand this business well enough to be confident it will be worth more in five years, regardless of what oil prices do in the next five months?

If the answer is yes, volatility is your friend. Not your enemy.

The Practical Takeaway

Let me make this concrete.

If you are a long-term investor, here is what the data and the history actually suggest you should do right now:

Do not sell into the fear. The average geopolitical shock produces a decline that reverses within weeks. Selling now means locking in losses and almost certainly missing the recovery.

Do not go all-in blindly either. The 1973 oil embargo is the cautionary tale. If the conflict drags on and oil prices remain structurally elevated, the macro picture becomes more complicated. Watch the ceasefire. Watch energy prices. Watch inflation data.

Use the volatility to add to quality. Earnings are still growing. Fear-driven price drops on fundamentally strong companies are opportunities in disguise. That is not spin. That is 80 years of market history.

Think in years, not weeks. The investors who made fortunes off every major crisis were not the ones who called the bottom perfectly. They were the ones who stayed calm, kept buying quality, and let compounding do the work.

The Bottom Line

War is scary. Headlines are loud. The natural human instinct is to protect what you have by doing nothing. Or worse, by selling.

But the market has survived every crisis in its history. Every war. Every recession. Every panic.

Motley Fool research found that if you had invested just $100 in an S&P 500 index fund on December 31, 1979, and weathered every recession since, that $100 would be worth more than $4,000 today on a total-return basis.

That is what staying in the game looks like over time.

The investors who will look back on April 2026 and wish they had acted differently are not the ones who stayed calm and kept buying quality. They are the ones who let fear make their decisions for them.

Buffett’s rule is simple. Following it is hard.

But the history of markets, across 80 years and dozens of crises, says the same thing every single time:

Fear is not a strategy. Patience is.

Share

If you found this useful, share it with someone who needs to read it right now.

They look at a stock and ask: “Why will this go up?”

Charlie Munger spent his entire career asking the opposite: “How could this go wrong?”

That single shift in thinking, from chasing wins to avoiding disasters, is one of the most powerful edges a long-term investor can have. And almost nobody uses it.

The Man Behind the Model

Charlie Munger wasn’t just Warren Buffett’s business partner at Berkshire Hathaway.

He was arguably the better thinker of the two.

Munger built his entire investment philosophy on a latticework of mental models (borrowed from psychology, mathematics, history, and physics) and applied them ruthlessly to every decision he made.

His favorite? Inversion.

The idea comes from a 19th-century German mathematician named Carl Jacobi, who had a simple mantra for solving hard problems:

“Man muss immer umkehren.”

Invert, always invert.

Munger heard this and never looked back.

What Inversion Actually Means

Here’s the simplest version:

Instead of asking “How do I pick a winning stock?”

Ask: “What would make this a terrible investment?”

Munger put it plainly:

“Tell me where I’m going to die, so I don’t go there.”

That’s the whole game. Not brilliance. Not finding the next Tesla. Just systematically avoiding the decisions that blow up your portfolio.

As Munger liked to say: “It is remarkable how much long-term advantage people like us have gotten by trying to be consistently not stupid, instead of trying to be very intelligent.”

Think about that for a second.

The goal isn’t to be smarter than everyone else. It’s to make fewer catastrophic mistakes. In the long run, that might be worth more than any brilliant stock pick.

Why Most Investors Skip This Step

Humans are wired to be optimistic.

When we like a stock, we look for reasons to buy it. We read the bull case. We nod along. We convince ourselves that the upside is obvious.

This is confirmation bias in action, and it’s expensive.

The antidote is inversion. Force yourself to make the bear case. Try to break your own thesis before the market does it for you.

Peter Lynch called this “knowing the story.” If you can’t explain clearly why a stock could fail (not just why it could succeed), you don’t fully understand it.

Buffett does the same thing. His two investing rules are famous:

Rule #1: Never lose money.

Rule #2: Never forget Rule #1.

That’s inversion. He’s not thinking about how to maximize gains. He’s thinking about how to avoid permanent loss of capital. Everything else follows.

The 5-Question Inversion Checklist

Here’s how to apply this to any stock you’re evaluating. Before you buy, work through these questions honestly:

1. How does this company go bankrupt?

Not hypothetically, but specifically. Is there a debt load that becomes unmanageable if rates stay high? A single customer that accounts for 40% of revenue? A technology that could be disrupted overnight?

2. What does this company’s moat look like in 10 years?

Think a decade from now. Can a well-funded competitor replicate their business model? Are switching costs real, or just convenient? Plenty of companies had “moats” that turned out to be sand.

3. What happens if management is wrong about their biggest bet?

Every company has a big story it’s selling. A new product category. An international expansion. A platform pivot. What if it doesn’t work? Does the core business survive that?

4. What would have to be true for this stock to drop 50%?

This is uncomfortable. Do it anyway. Is a regulatory change possible? A major customer leaving? A margin collapse? If you can construct a credible path to -50%, you need to decide if you’re comfortable owning through that scenario.

5. Am I paying for a business, or a story?

High-multiple stocks price in a lot of optimism. If the story slows down (i.e., growth decelerates, a partnership falls apart, the macro turns), does the valuation hold up? Or are you exposed to a narrative unraveling?

A Real-World Example: Applying Inversion

Let’s make this concrete.

Take any fast-growing consumer health company. The bull case writes itself: recurring revenue, expanding TAM, explosive subscriber growth.

But run it through the inversion checklist, and different questions emerge fast:

• What if growth came partly from a regulatory gray area that gets closed off?

• What if the “moat” is really just branding, which a well-funded incumbent can outspend?

• What if margins compress as competition heats up and customer acquisition costs rise?

• What if the stock is priced for a $6B revenue outcome that may be 5 years away?

Suddenly, the picture is more complicated.

That doesn’t mean you don’t invest. It means you invest with your eyes open, knowing the risks and paying the right price, rather than buying into a story without pressure-testing it first.

Munger’s inversion doesn’t tell you not to take risks. It tells you to understand them before you do.

The Verdict: A Simple Edge Most Investors Ignore

Here’s the truth about long-term investing:

The investors who compound wealth over decades aren’t necessarily the best stock-pickers.

They’re the ones who don’t blow up.

They avoid the frauds. They avoid the terminal business model declines. They avoid paying 50x for a company that needed everything to go right — and didn’t.

Inversion is how you get there.

It takes five minutes. It’s uncomfortable. And it will save you from more mistakes than any bull case ever will.

Before you buy your next stock, don’t just ask why it could win.

Ask where it could die, so you don’t go there.

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always do your own research before making any investment decisions.

SpaceX is filing its IPO prospectus with the SEC, possibly this week, targeting a June 2026 listing at a $1.75 trillion valuation.

Let that number sink in for a second.

Google went public in 2004 at a $23 billion valuation. Facebook debuted in 2012 at $81 billion. Uber (the most hyped ride-share IPO of all time) came in at $75 billion.

SpaceX would dwarf every single one of them on day one.

This is not a normal IPO. And it deserves a deeper look.

What Even Is an IPO, And Why You Should Be Careful

An IPO is the moment a private company opens its doors to public investors for the first time. Founders, early employees, and venture backers, who’ve been holding illiquid stakes for years, finally get liquidity.

Here’s what most retail investors miss: the IPO is designed to benefit the sellers, not the buyers.

Investment banks price the offering as high as the market will bear (no pun intended). The roadshow is a marketing campaign. By the time the stock hits your brokerage account, insiders have already locked in their gains.

The data is pretty consistent here: IPOs underperform the broader market in the first 3-5 years after going public, on average. The exceptions include Amazon, Google, and Visa, which rewarded investors because the business was exceptional. The IPO excitement was irrelevant.

How SpaceX Compares to the Biggest IPOs in History

Here’s the IPO valuation leaderboard and where SpaceX would land:

• SpaceX (2026): $1.75 trillion

• Saudi Aramco (2019): $1.7 trillion

• Alibaba (2014): $169 billion

• Uber (2019): $75 billion

• Facebook / Meta (2012): $81 billion

• Google (2004): $23 billion

• Tesla (2010): $1.7 billion

SpaceX would not only top the list but also have a valuation that exceeds the combined value of all other U.S. tech IPOs.

And here’s the cautionary tale hiding in that list: the most hyped IPOs often disappoint in the short term.

• Facebook dropped nearly 50% in its first few months before eventually becoming one of the greatest investments in history for those patient enough to wait

• Uber fell 8% on day one and kept sliding for over a year

• Google had to cut its IPO price twice before going public, then quietly became a 6,500% compounder for long-term holders

• Tesla IPO’d at $1.7 billion in 2010 and became a $1 trillion company, but only after years of near-bankruptcy, short-seller wars, and extreme volatility

The lesson? Great companies can still be terrible short-term IPO investments.

So, What Are You Actually Buying With SpaceX?

Most people think of SpaceX as “Elon’s rocket company.” However, that’s like calling Amazon “Jeff’s bookstore.”

After its February 2026 merger with xAI, here’s what the SpaceX entity actually includes:

• SpaceX Launch Business: The world’s dominant commercial rocket provider, completing over 160 launches a year, more than half of all global orbital launches.

• Starlink: The crown jewel. A global satellite internet business with 9.2 million subscribers as of late 2025, doubling its user base in 15 months. Revenue crossed $10 billion last year. High-margin, subscription-based, global reach. This is what justifies the trillion-dollar valuation.

• xAI (Grok + AI Infrastructure): Musk’s AI company is now a fully owned subsidiary of SpaceX, featuring the Grok chatbot and a plan for space-based AI data centers. It is currently investing heavily to scale up, which poses a significant risk ahead of the IPO.

• X (formerly Twitter): Indirectly included via the xAI acquisition. Still struggling financially, but brings a massive global user base.

• Terafab: A joint Tesla-SpaceX chip manufacturing facility, just announced in Austin, Texas. One factory for Tesla’s AI and robotics needs; one for SpaceX’s orbital data centers. The first tangible sign of what a combined Musk empire could look like.

When you buy SpaceX stock, you’re buying a telecom company, an AI startup, a defense contractor, a social media platform, and a space exploration company, all under one cap table.

How SpaceX Actually Makes Money - And Is It Profitable?

This is where the story gets genuinely interesting.

SpaceX has two real revenue engines right now:

• Starlink (~67% of revenue): A subscription-based satellite internet. Residential plans run ~$85- $120/month; maritime and aviation contracts go for far more. With 9.2 million subscribers across 150+ countries, Morningstar estimates Starlink generated roughly $10.6 billion in revenue in 2025 at a 54% EBITDA margin. That’s not a startup metric. That’s a mature, high-margin telecom business.

• Launch Services (~33% of revenue): Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy commercial launches at roughly $62-125 million per mission, plus NASA contracts, Pentagon deals, and crewed missions. The reusable rocket program has cut launch costs by an estimated 65%, giving SpaceX a cost advantage no competitor can currently match. In 2024, only 6% of Falcon 9 flights used new boosters. The rest were reflown hardware.

The profitability question: Yes, SpaceX is profitable. The company has reported being cash-flow positive for several years, conducting regular share buybacks. Morningstar estimates $7.5 billion in EBITDA for 2025 on roughly $16 billion in total revenue. For context, that’s a ~47% EBITDA margin whic his better than most software companies.

The catch: xAI is burning cash aggressively, and Starship development is enormously expensive. Both are now on SpaceX’s balance sheet. The core SpaceX + Starlink business is healthy. The question going into the IPO is how much of the $1.75 trillion valuation you’re paying for today’s profits versus tomorrow’s moonshots.

The Tesla-SpaceX Merger: Real or Rumor?

Bloomberg, Reuters, and TechCrunch have all reported that SpaceX is actively exploring merger scenarios with Tesla and/or xAI (which is already merging with SpaceX).

Two Nevada “merger sub” entities were quietly filed in January 2026, listing SpaceX’s CFO as an officer. That’s not nothing.

Wedbush analyst Dan Ives (one of the more credible voices covering Musk’s empire) has publicly predicted that Tesla and SpaceX will fully merge by 2027, calling Terafab the first step toward full integration.

The strategic logic is actually compelling:

• Tesla’s energy storage could power SpaceX’s solar-driven orbital data centers

• Starlink connectivity could enhance Tesla’s Robotaxi and Full Self-Driving network

• Optimus robots (Tesla) assembling Starship components (SpaceX) - Musk has literally said this out loud

The problem? Betting markets currently put only 15% odds on a Tesla-SpaceX merger and about 48% on the SpaceX-xAI combination already in progress. A full Tesla deal would invite serious antitrust scrutiny; a combined entity of $2.6 trillion spanning EVs, energy, space, telecom, and AI would be unlike anything regulators have seen.

Bottom line: A merger is possible. Maybe even likely eventually. But it’s not priced in yet, and the uncertainty it creates is one more reason to approach this IPO with eyes wide open.

The Bull Case

Let’s be fair to the optimists.

Musk has a track record that’s genuinely hard to dismiss. Tesla went from near-bankruptcy in 2018 to one of the most valuable automakers on Earth. SpaceX went from a punchline to owning half the global launch market. Starlink went from science fiction to 9 million paying subscribers.

Musk not only creates companies but also develops ecosystems, often making the impossible seem obvious in retrospect.

If Starlink reaches 50+ million subscribers, if space-based AI infrastructure becomes reality, if Starship delivers - the growth runway here is unlike anything else in the public markets.

This is the Peter Lynch argument. Lynch invested in companies doing new things he could see and understand. SpaceX’s story, for all its complexity, is real.

The Bear Case

Now the Buffett lens.

Buffett avoids businesses he can’t value clearly, businesses burning cash to scale, and businesses run by CEOs who introduce unpredictability.

Valuation. At roughly 60-70x projected 2026 revenue, SpaceX is priced for perfection and then some. Buffett has never paid 60x revenue for anything.

The xAI problem. xAI is reportedly hemorrhaging money scaling AI compute. That red ink now sits on SpaceX’s balance sheet going into the IPO.

Musk himself. SEC quiet period rules exist for a reason. Musk has historically not been quiet. As Axios noted this week: “Today’s Musk may struggle to comport with rules about what company insiders can and can’t say once the IPO process begins.”

Governance. Musk owns a significantly larger stake in SpaceX than Tesla. Every dollar SpaceX raises at an inflated valuation benefits him disproportionately. Munger’s question always applies: “Show me the incentive and I’ll show you the outcome.”

My Take: I’m Actually Considering This One

Here’s my general rule: I almost never invest in an IPO during the first 6-12 months. IPOs are volatile, overpriced at launch, and driven by hype rather than fundamentals. Waiting for the dust to settle, for earnings reports, lockup expirations, and media excitement to fade, almost always produces a better entry point.

And yet.

SpaceX is making me reconsider that rule for the first time in a while.

Not because the IPO is priced fairly. Because I don’t know that it is. Not because the short-term will be smooth, as it likely won’t be. But because the window to get in on Musk’s most powerful asset may not come again. SpaceX has been private for 24 years. This isn’t a startup going public. It’s a proven, cash-flow-positive machine with a global telecom business at its core and an AI company bolted on top. All going public in a single shot.

Facebook cratered after its IPO, then 10x’d. Google was forced to cut its price before going public, then 65x’d. Tesla was a meme before it was a trillion-dollar company.

I’m still working through the risk. The valuation is uncomfortable. The xAI losses are real. The merger uncertainty is real. But I’m watching this one very closely, and I may just break my own rule.

I’ll keep you posted.

Not investment advice. Do your own research. This is a breakdown to help you think, not a recommendation to buy or sell.

Thanks for reading Stock Pickz. Forward this to someone who needs to know about it.

And not every controversial company is a bad one.

Hims & Hers (HIMS) sits right in that tension. It’s one of the fastest-growing consumer health platforms in the market. But it’s also one of the more debated.

This isn’t a stock pick to the Stock Pickz portfolio. It’s a breakdown so you can decide for yourself.

The Business: Simple Idea, Powerful Model

At its core, Hims is a direct-to-consumer telehealth platform.

It sells treatments for things people often don’t want to talk about:

• Hair loss

• Erectile dysfunction

• Mental health

• Weight loss

The genius here (a very “Peter Lynch” style thesis) is simplicity. This is not cutting-edge biotech. It’s consumer behavior + convenience.

Instead of doctor visits and pharmacies, Hims offers:

• Online consultations

• Subscription-based treatments

• Recurring delivery

And that last part matters most.

Over 90% of revenue is recurring from subscriptions, creating predictable cash flow and strong retention.

Buffett loves businesses with repeat customers. On the surface, Hims checks that box.

The Growth: Hard to Ignore

Hims is growing fast. Really fast.

• 2025 revenue: ~$2.35 billion (+59% YoY) (Hims Inc.)

• Quarterly growth consistently ~50%+ (Hims Inc.)

• ~2.5 million subscribers and rising (Hims Inc.)

That’s elite growth for a company at this scale.

Even more interesting: revenue per subscriber is increasing, suggesting pricing power and deeper engagement.

From a Peter Lynch perspective, this is exactly the type of “fast grower” that can outperform, but only if the story holds.

The Bull Case: A Modern Consumer Health Platform

The optimistic view is straightforward:

Hims isn’t just a telehealth company. It’s attempting to become a full-stack healthcare platform.

They’re expanding into:

• Hormone therapy

• Diagnostics and lab testing

• International markets

• Personalized medicine

Management is targeting $6.5B+ revenue by 2030. (Hims Inc.)

If they pull this off, Hims could evolve from a niche brand into a dominant consumer health ecosystem.

Think less “online pharmacy” and more “Netflix of healthcare.”

The Concerns: Where the Story Gets Messy

Now let’s shift to the Buffett lens: What could go wrong?

1. Regulatory Risk (Big One)

A large portion of recent growth came from weight-loss drugs (GLP-1s).

But here’s the issue:

• Hims sold compounded “knockoff” versions of drugs like semaglutide

• Regulators tightened rules once shortages ended

• A major partner (Novo Nordisk) cut ties

The result? A sharp stock drop and real uncertainty.

This is critical: If your growth depends on regulatory gray areas, it’s not a moat, it’s a risk.

2. Margin Pressure

Despite strong revenue growth:

• Costs are rising faster than revenue

• Gross margins are compressing

• Heavy investment is required to scale

Buffett avoids businesses that require constant reinvestment just to stay competitive.

Hims may be entering that territory.

3. Brand vs. Moat

Here’s a key question:

What stops competitors from copying this?

• Telehealth? Replicable

• Subscriptions? Common

• Generic medications? Widely available

Hims’ moat is likely:

• Branding

• Customer acquisition

• User experience

Don’t get me wrong, that’s valuable. But it’s not invincible.

4. Valuation vs. Reality

Even after volatility, HIMS has traded at premium multiples vs. peers.

That means expectations are high.

And high expectations + uncertainty is not a combination Buffett typically bets on.

The Verdict: Interesting, But Not Obvious

Hims & Hers is a fascinating company.

On the one hand:

• Explosive growth

• Recurring revenue

• Expanding product ecosystem

On the other:

• Regulatory overhang

• Margin pressure

• Questionable moat

This is not a classic Buffett stock.

But it is the kind of company Peter Lynch might watch closely, especially if growth remains strong and the story becomes clearer.

Final Thought

Hims feels like a company at a crossroads:

• It could become a dominant consumer healthcare platform

• Or it could prove to be a growth story built on unstable ground

The difference will come down to one thing:

Can it build a durable moat beyond hype-driven growth?

That’s the question worth watching.

For personal computers, it was Microsoft.
For smartphones, it was Apple.

For artificial intelligence, it’s NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA).

And the reason is simple: NVIDIA doesn’t just make AI chips. It built the entire ecosystem that modern AI runs on.

The Thesis in One Sentence

NVIDIA doesn’t just make the best AI chips; it owns the full computing stack that AI runs on, and every major nation, hyperscaler, and enterprise on earth is racing to buy more of it.

From Video Games to the Center of AI

NVIDIA originally built its business around gaming.

Back in 1999, the company invented the GPU (graphics processing unit), a chip designed to render video game graphics faster and more realistically. For years, gaming was NVIDIA’s core business.

But something unexpected happened.

Engineers discovered that GPUs were incredibly good at running the complex math required to train artificial intelligence models. While traditional CPUs process tasks sequentially, GPUs can handle thousands of calculations simultaneously.

That made them perfect for AI.

Even more important, NVIDIA spent two decades building a software platform called CUDA that lets developers program these chips efficiently.

That decision changed everything.

By the time the AI boom arrived in the early 2020s, NVIDIA wasn’t just selling powerful chips. It had already built the software, tools, and developer ecosystem needed to run AI workloads.

In other words, NVIDIA wasn’t just ready for the AI revolution.

It had been quietly building the foundation for it.

The Growth Has Been Explosive

The results have been staggering.

In fiscal 2025, NVIDIA generated $215.9 billion in revenue, representing 65% growth year-over-year.

To put that into perspective, NVIDIA added more revenue in a single year than many Fortune 500 companies generate in total.

Even more striking is where that revenue now comes from.

The company’s data center division, which powers AI infrastructure, now accounts for roughly 88% of total revenue. Gaming, once the heart of the company, has become a relatively small piece of the overall business.

In the most recent quarter alone, NVIDIA generated about $68 billion in revenue.

Demand for its AI chips remains incredibly strong as companies race to build the computing power needed to train and run AI models.

NVIDIA’s Biggest Advantage

NVIDIA’s dominance isn’t just about having the best chips.

It’s about the ecosystem.

Today, NVIDIA controls roughly 90% of the AI chip market. And despite massive investments from competitors, that share hasn’t meaningfully changed.

Why?

Because millions of developers already rely on NVIDIA’s software.

More than 4 million engineers are trained on CUDA, and the most popular AI frameworks (tools like PyTorch and TensorFlow) are optimized to run on NVIDIA hardware.

Switching away from NVIDIA isn’t just a matter of buying a different chip.

Companies would have to rewrite software, retrain engineers, and potentially accept slower performance as they adapt to a new platform.

That creates enormous switching costs.

It’s one of the reasons competitors like AMD and Intel have struggled to gain meaningful market share in AI chips.

NVIDIA Keeps Extending Its Lead

Technology leadership also matters.

NVIDIA continues to release new generations of AI chips that dramatically increase performance and efficiency.

Its newest architecture, Blackwell, delivers roughly 10 times the computing power per unit of energy compared to the previous generation.

That improvement is crucial because AI data centers consume massive amounts of electricity. Faster and more efficient chips allow companies to train larger models while keeping energy costs under control.

According to NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, demand for these chips has been overwhelming, with many cloud providers already sold out.

In other words, NVIDIA is more than just staying ahead of competitors.

It’s widening the gap.

The Bigger Opportunity: AI Infrastructure

Forget the hype. The real investment case for NVIDIA is about a structural shift in how computing infrastructure is built.

Over the next decade, companies and governments are expected to spend trillions of dollars building AI data centers.

Some estimates suggest that total spending on AI infrastructure could reach $8 trillion by 2030.

Countries are beginning to treat AI infrastructure the same way past generations treated electricity grids, highways, or telecommunications networks, as critical national assets.

That means demand is no longer tech companies alone - it’s everyone.

It’s coming from governments, enterprises, research institutions, and startups, all of which are trying to build AI capabilities.

And NVIDIA sits right in the middle of that global buildout.

The Risks Investors Should Understand

Even great companies face real risks.

One challenge is geopolitical. The United States has placed restrictions on exporting advanced AI chips to China, which limits how much business NVIDIA can do in that market.

Another risk comes from large technology companies building their own custom chips.

Companies like Google, Amazon, and Meta are all investing heavily in proprietary AI processors.

These chips may handle certain workloads, particularly for running AI models at scale.

However, NVIDIA still dominates the most demanding part of the market: training large AI models, which requires enormous computing power.

Finally, there’s the issue of valuation.

After its massive stock run, NVIDIA is priced for continued growth. If demand slows or expectations aren’t met, the stock could experience significant volatility.

The Bottom Line

NVIDIA has become the backbone of the modern AI economy.

Its advantage extends beyond hardware alone; it encompasses a combination of chips, software, developer adoption, and a substantial global demand for AI computing.

That kind of ecosystem is extremely difficult to replicate.

The company isn’t cheap by traditional valuation metrics. But it’s also operating at the center of one of the biggest technology shifts in decades.

Put simply:

If the world continues to invest trillions in AI infrastructure, NVIDIA will likely remain one of the biggest beneficiaries.

During gold rushes, the most reliable money is often made by the companies selling the tools.

Right now, NVIDIA is selling the most important tools in the AI gold rush.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always consult a licensed financial professional before making investment decisions.

Headlines get darker. Financial news channels run constant “breaking news” banners. Social media fills with predictions of crashes, recessions, and financial catastrophe.

Suddenly, investors who were confident just weeks earlier begin questioning everything:

• Should I sell?

• Should I wait for things to calm down?

• Is this the start of something much worse?

In moments like this, it’s important to remember one simple truth:

The stock market is driven as much by human emotion as it is by economic fundamentals.

And when fear takes over, logic often disappears.

For long-term investors, that’s not a danger.
It’s an opportunity.

The Psychology of Panic

Human beings are not wired to be great investors.

Our brains evolved to avoid danger and protect us from loss. In markets, that instinct often works against us.

When stock prices fall, our natural reaction is to protect ourselves. Losses feel far more painful than gains feel rewarding. Psychologists call this loss aversion, and it’s one of the biggest reasons investors make poor decisions during volatile markets.

Instead of asking whether a business remains strong, investors focus on the falling price. They begin to confuse temporary volatility with permanent damage.

That’s when panic selling begins.

Legendary investor Peter Lynch once put it perfectly:

“Far more money has been lost by investors trying to anticipate corrections than lost in the corrections themselves.”

Investors who constantly try to dodge downturns often end up doing the opposite of what they should: selling low and buying back higher.

The irony is that the very moments that feel the most dangerous are often when the best long-term opportunities appear.

Fear Always Feels Permanent

Every market downturn feels different.

In the moment, the headlines make it seem like this time must be worse than all the others.

We’ve seen it during:

• The 2008 financial crisis

• The COVID crash in 2020

• Inflation scares

• Banking crises

• Wars and geopolitical conflicts

Each event created intense fear across financial markets. Investors believed the damage might last for years.

Yet history tells a different story. Markets recover. Businesses adapt. Innovation continues.

Over long periods of time, stock prices ultimately follow earnings growth and economic progress, not short-term panic.

This is why volatility is not a flaw in the market system. It’s simply the price investors must pay to achieve long-term returns.

As Charlie Munger famously said:

“If you’re not willing to react with equanimity to a market price decline of 50%, you shouldn’t be in the stock market.”

In other words, volatility is not something investors should fear. It’s something they should expect.

A Perfect Example: Weekend Panic vs. Monday Reality

This past weekend was a perfect example of how quickly fear can distort reality.

Scrolling through my X feed, it felt like financial Armageddon was guaranteed. Influencers and anonymous accounts were predicting the worst market drop in history, claiming the market was “finished” and that investors should brace for a massive crash when trading opened Monday.

If you spent enough time reading those posts, you could easily convince yourself that disaster was inevitable.

But when Monday arrived, the market’s reaction was far from the apocalyptic predictions flooding social media.

This happens constantly in investing. Short-term narratives dominate the conversation, and fear spreads faster than facts.

By the way, if you enjoy long-term investing commentary without the panic-driven noise, feel free to follow me on X at @StockPickz_HQ, where I break down market events from a long-term investor’s perspective.

The takeaway here is simple: social media can amplify emotion, not necessarily reality.

And investors who make decisions based on emotional crowd reactions often regret it later.

Why Down Markets Create Opportunity

When markets fall, something important happens that many investors overlook:

Future returns increase.

When stock prices decline, but the underlying businesses remain strong, investors suddenly have the ability to buy those businesses at lower prices.

It’s the equivalent of a sale at your favorite store.

But unlike a retail sale, many investors run away when prices drop.

Long-term investors understand the opposite approach is often more rational.

If you liked a company at $100, you should theoretically like it even more at $80, assuming the fundamentals haven’t changed.

This is why legendary investors often welcome downturns.

Warren Buffett famously summarized this mindset with one of the most quoted lines in investing:

“Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.”

Market corrections are uncomfortable in the moment. But they create the conditions that allow patient investors to accumulate more shares of high-quality companies at attractive prices.

Over time, those lower entry points can dramatically improve long-term returns.

Peter Lynch on Pullbacks

Few investors understood market psychology better than Peter Lynch, the legendary manager of Fidelity’s Magellan Fund.

Lynch repeatedly emphasized that investors should not allow short-term market movements to shake them out of good investments.

He once said:

“I’ve found that when the market’s going down and you buy funds wisely, at some point in the future you will be happy.”

The challenge, of course, is emotional.

Buying during a market pullback rarely feels comfortable. It often feels like stepping in front of a falling knife.

But history shows that some of the best investments are made during periods of maximum uncertainty.

The investors who succeed over decades are not the ones who perfectly time the market.

They are the ones who stay invested and continue buying when prices fall.

Geopolitical Fear and Today’s Market

Today’s market environment is once again being shaped by geopolitical uncertainty.

Tensions in the Middle East — particularly surrounding Iran — have sparked fears about potential conflict, energy disruptions, and global instability.

Whenever geopolitical events escalate, markets tend to react quickly.

Oil prices spike. Investors reduce risk. Stocks decline as uncertainty rises.

But historically, markets have shown a remarkable ability to absorb geopolitical shocks and move forward.

Wars, sanctions, and political conflicts often dominate headlines in the short term, yet the long-term impact on global economic growth is often far smaller than investors initially fear.

Businesses continue operating. Consumers keep spending. Innovation continues to advance.

In many cases, geopolitical panic creates temporary mispricing in the market.

Companies that were strong yesterday are suddenly cheaper today. Not because their long-term prospects changed, but because fear temporarily overwhelmed rational analysis.

For disciplined investors, these moments can represent some of the best opportunities to add to long-term positions.

Leaning In While Others Panic

The biggest edge a long-term investor has isn’t superior intelligence.

It’s emotional discipline.

When markets fall, most investors instinctively pull back. They wait for clarity. They wait for stability.

But by the time things feel safe again, prices are often much higher.

The investors who benefit most from market volatility are usually the ones willing to do the uncomfortable thing: buy while others are selling.

That doesn’t mean blindly buying every dip.

It means focusing on strong businesses, maintaining a long-term horizon, and recognizing that fear often creates opportunities.

Market history shows that the biggest gains often follow the periods of greatest pessimism.

The Real Edge in Investing

The stock market has often been described as a machine that transfers wealth from the impatient to the patient.

Crises will continue to happen.
Markets will continue to fall from time to time.
Fear will continue to dominate headlines.

But the investors who succeed over decades learn to see these moments differently.

They don’t see panic as danger.

They see it as opportunity.

And when markets drop because of fear, long-term investors don’t run away.

They go shopping.

The news from the Middle East weighs heavily. A long-anticipated event driven by stopping the Iranian cancer before it became an imminent threat to the US and its allies. The conflict escalated sharply on February 28, 2026, with coordinated U.S.-Israeli strikes that resulted in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and numerous senior figures. Iran’s retaliatory missile and drone attacks have targeted U.S. bases, Israel, and sites across the region, leading to significant casualties, including U.S. service members killed in action.

President Trump has indicated operations may continue for weeks, with the potential for further escalation. Markets reacted swiftly: oil prices surged (Brent crude climbing as much as 13% early Monday before settling around $78-80 per barrel amid Strait of Hormuz disruptions), gold rose, and stocks opened lower before rebounding—the S&P 500 closed flat, while the Nasdaq edged up 0.4%.

As long-term investors, we recognize these events create real uncertainty. Yet, history shows they are often short-lived disruptions in the broader upward trend of markets driven by economic fundamentals. With that perspective in mind, let’s examine the implications calmly and strategically, guided by timeless advice from Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch.

Historical Insights: Markets Endure and Rebound

Geopolitical shocks, while serious, have consistently proven temporary for diversified, patient portfolios. Since World War II, major conflicts have typically triggered an average S&P 500 decline of around 5%, with bottoms reached in about three weeks and full recoveries often within months. One year later, stocks have been positive in roughly 73% of cases, delivering high single-digit average returns.

A quick comparison of past events:

Markets adapt quickly as the risk of prolonged disruption fades and underlying growth (corporate earnings, innovation, productivity) takes precedence. Peter Lynch often emphasized that volatility is the price of admission for long-term equity returns, occurring roughly every couple of years in the form of 10% drops and every six years with deeper corrections. His view: downturns are opportunities to acquire quality businesses at better prices.

Current Stock Market Trends: Volatility with Bright Spots

This conflict has introduced fresh risks, particularly around energy supply. Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and attacks on regional infrastructure have fueled inflation concerns, pushing Treasury yields higher and potentially delaying Fed rate cuts. Sectors like airlines, cruises, and consumer discretionary have felt the pressure from higher fuel costs.

On the other side, energy companies (Exxon, Chevron up 3-5%), defense firms (Lockheed Martin, RTX gaining 2-4%), and safe-haven assets like gold have performed well. Broader indices showed resilience, with buyers stepping in during dips, suggesting the market views the situation as contained rather than systemic.

The human impact remains front and center: lost lives on all sides, including American service members and civilians caught in the crossfire, underscore the gravity beyond balance sheets. Yet for investors focused on the long term, the key is distinguishing transient noise from enduring opportunity.

Strategies for Long-Term Investors: Wisdom from Buffett and Lynch

Warren Buffett’s famous line - “Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful” - captures the mindset needed now. He has repeatedly bought during periods of maximum pessimism, holding cash for when quality assets trade at discounts. Peter Lynch complemented this by advising investors to focus on the underlying businesses rather than daily headlines: “If you like a stock at 14 and it goes to 6, that’s great.”

Practical approaches in this environment:

• Diversify Wisely: Maintain exposure across sectors and regions to mitigate concentrated risks. Consider tilting toward US-centric energy or defense while keeping broad market balance. Buffett’s approach includes holding cash reserves (10-20% liquidity) to act decisively.

• Avoid Knee-Jerk Reactions: Selling into fear often means missing the rebound. Lynch stressed that time in the market beats timing the market, especially over 5-20 year horizons.

• Focus on Fundamentals: Prioritize companies with strong balance sheets, competitive advantages, and pricing power to weather inflation or supply issues. StockPickz recommendations include Lockheed Martin (defense sector strength amid heightened needs), Chevron (benefiting from elevated oil prices), and Barrick Gold (a classic haven play during uncertainty). These align with Lynch’s “buy what you know” philosophy - familiar, resilient businesses.

• Dollar-Cost Average: Invest steadily through volatility to reduce average cost basis, a Lynch favorite for building positions patiently.

These principles have served investors through countless crises, rewarding discipline over emotion.

Wrapping Up: Patience Amid the Storm

The current conflict is serious, with real human and economic stakes, but markets have navigated similar challenges before and emerged stronger. Buffett noted during past downturns that bad news often creates the best buying opportunities, while Lynch reminded us that staying invested through volatility is essential for capturing long-term gains.

Stay informed, remain diversified, and keep perspective.

Artificial intelligence is no longer a sci-fi dream—it’s transforming how we live, work, and invest. But not all AI stocks are created equal. At Stock Pickz, we dig deep, channeling Warren Buffett’s obsession with economic moats, Peter Lynch’s knack for spotting growth, and Charlie Munger’s discipline for enduring value.

Our mission? Find companies that aren’t just riding the AI wave but powering its core. Think AI stocks with high returns on equity, explosive revenue growth, and fortress-like market positions. The AI market, already at $391 billion in 2025, is projected to soar to $1.8 trillion by 2030, growing at a 35.9% annual growth rate.1 The five stocks we’re sharing today are the backbone of this revolution, built to deliver for the next 5-10 years or more.

Why AI Matters Now

AI is everywhere. From diagnosing diseases, securing networks, to steering self-driving cars like Tesla. But the real money isn’t in trendy apps or chatbots - it’s in the infrastructure that makes AI possible. This includes chips, data platforms, networking, and security. These are the picks-and-shovels of the AI gold rush, offering the kind of durable advantages Buffett loves.

The Stock Pickz portfolio thrives on companies with strong fundamentals and wide moats. The five stocks below aren’t just AI players; they’re essential to its growth. These companies have the financial muscle and market dominance to reward investors for years to come.

What to Look for in AI Stocks

Picking the right AI stocks means focusing on companies that are vital to the industry’s growth, not just riding its coattails. We’re hunting for businesses that power AI’s core. Here’s what to look for in AI stocks:

• Vital Role in AI: Choose companies central to AI’s infrastructure. NVIDIA’s GPUs power between 70% and 90% of AI workloads,2 while Broadcom’s switches connect data centers for Google and Meta.

• Marquee Customers: Look for firms serving top players. For example - Palantir’s AIP platform supports the Pentagon and Fortune 500 firms, and Snowflake’s Data Cloud is used by NVIDIA itself.

• Strong Financials: High ROE, double-digit revenue growth, and robust cash with low debt all signal strong staying power.

• Wide Moats: Seek unassailable advantages. CrowdStrike’s AI-driven cybersecurity dominates with sticky subscriptions, and Broadcom’s large share in networking is tough to crack.

• Game-Changing Product Launches: Prioritize companies shaping AI’s landscape. NVIDIA’s H100 GPU redefined AI training; Palantir’s AIP platform brought analytics to new heights.

These traits mirror Stock Pickz portfolio strategies. Built to last, not flash-in-the-pan bets. Use the checklist above to spot AI winners that can anchor your portfolio for the long haul, just like our five picks below.

The 5 AI Stocks of the Decade

These 5 stocks were picked due to rock-solid financials, strong industry moats, innovative leadership, and currently in hyper-growth mode.

NVIDIA (NVDA): The AI Chip King

NVIDIA is the heart of AI, powering over 70%-90% of the world’s AI workloads with its H100 and B100 GPUs. Its CUDA and TensorRT software make it the go-to for training complex models, from chatbots to autonomous vehicles. If AI is the engine, NVIDIA’s the fuel.

• Financial Strength: 115% ROE, 69% revenue growth yoy, $53.7 billion in cash, minimal debt, $55 billion in levered free cash flow, and 4% insider ownership.3

• Moat: Dominates the GPU market with unmatched performance; competitors like AMD are years behind.

• Leadership: CEO Jensen Huang is AI’s visionary, pushing chips and software to new heights.

Over the next decade, AI chip demand is expected to grow rapidly. NVIDIA’s unmatched position makes it a cornerstone for any AI portfolio. “AI is the most powerful technology force of our time,” says Huang.

Palantir (PLTR): The AI Analytics Master

Palantir’s AI Platform (AIP) delivers analytics that turn data into decisions for governments and enterprises. From Pentagon contracts to corporate fraud detection, its AI is mission-critical, securing sensitive operations with unmatched precision.

• Financial Strength: 39% revenue growth, $5.4 billion in cash, low debt, 3.65% insider ownership, $0.9 billion in levered free cash flow.4

• Moat: Sticky contracts with defense and enterprise clients create a high barrier to entry.

• Leadership: CEO Alex Karp focuses on real-world AI outcomes, not hype.

Palantir’s secure, scalable platform positions it for a decade of dominance, mirroring Coinbase’s crypto disruption.

CrowdStrike (CRWD): The AI Security Guardian

CrowdStrike’s Falcon platform uses AI to stop cyber threats in real time, protecting the data centers and enterprises driving AI’s growth. As AI adoption surges, so does the need for ironclad security, and CrowdStrike leads the pack.

• Financial Strength: 25% revenue growth, $4.3 billion cash, minimal debt, 3.2% insider ownership, $1.29 billion levered free cash flow.5

• Moat: Leads endpoint security with AI-driven threat detection; competitors like Palo Alto trail.

• Leadership: CEO George Kurtz pioneers AI-powered cybersecurity.

With cybersecurity demand tied to AI’s rise, CrowdStrike’s growth is just beginning, much like PayPal’s fintech dominance.

Snowflake (SNOW): The AI Data Powerhouse

Snowflake’s cloud-agnostic Data Cloud manages the massive datasets that fuel AI models, used by giants like NVIDIA. Its platform enables seamless data storage and analytics across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, making it indispensable for AI training.

• Financial Strength: 25.7% quarterly revenue growth, $3.9 billion cash, 4.15% insider ownership, $1.16 billion levered free cash flow.6

• Moat: Its unique data-sharing architecture sets it apart from Databricks and others.

• Leadership: CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy, ex-Google, drives AI-focused features like Cortex.

As AI models demand more data, Snowflake’s platform will thrive.

Broadcom (AVGO): The AI Data Center Connectivity King

Broadcom powers AI data centers with Tomahawk switches and custom ASICs, enabling hyperscalers like Google to train massive models. Its networking chips ensure the high-speed connectivity AI demands, making it a linchpin of the industry.

• Financial Strength: 14.85% ROE, 16.4% revenue growth, $11.11 billion cash, 2% insider ownership, $25.26 billion levered free cash flow.7

• Moat: 40% share in data center switching; sticky ASIC contracts with hyperscalers.

• Leadership: CEO Hock Tan drives AI chip innovation and strategic acquisitions.

With data centers fueling AI’s trillion-dollar future, Broadcom’s role is secure, mirroring hardware dominance, much like Apple did with iOS, MacBooks, and iPhones.

How These Fit Your Portfolio

If you’re looking to supercharge your investments, NVIDIA, Palantir, CrowdStrike, Snowflake, and Broadcom are standout choices for any portfolio looking to get exposure to the AI revolution. These aren’t new additions to our carefully curated Stock Pickz portfolio, but they share the same DNA.

Each delivers high ROE, double-digit revenue growth, and wide moats, perfectly matching our Buffett-inspired focus on enduring value and Lynch’s eye for growth.

These stocks are built to power AI’s decade-long boom, offering the kind of staying power we demand for 5-10+ year investments. Add these to your own portfolio, and you’re betting on AI’s future with the same principles that guide our proven winners. Could one of these AI stocks be part of the Stock Pickz Portfolio in the near future? Guess you’ll have to wait and see!

Robinhood (NASDAQ: HOOD) has turned this vision into reality, tearing down the walls of traditional investing with commission-free trading, a sleek app, and features that make finance feel like second nature. It’s not just a brokerage; it’s a movement that’s empowered millions to take control of their financial future. As a long-term stock pick, Robinhood dazzles with its disruptive innovations, skyrocketing financials, and a bold roadmap to dominate fintech. Let’s dive into why Robinhood is a promising bet on the future of wealth creation.

Company Overview

Robinhood Markets, Inc., born in 2013 in Menlo Park, California, is the fintech rebel that redefined retail investing. With 25.8 million funded accounts by March 2025, it’s the go-to platform for younger, tech-savvy investors (average user age: 35), who see investing not as a privilege but a right. Think of Robinhood as the bridge between Wall Street’s complexity and Main Street’s ambition.

What They Do

Robinhood’s mobile-first platform offers commission-free trading of stocks, ETFs, options, and cryptocurrencies, wrapped in an interface so intuitive it feels like a social media app. From fractional shares that let you own a slice of Amazon for $1 to AI-driven insights via Robinhood Cortex, it’s designed to make investing accessible, engaging, and even fun. Beyond trading, Robinhood offers wealth management tools, a Prediction Market Hub for event-based betting, and a Gold Credit Card, building a financial ecosystem for the modern investor.

Leadership

Behind Robinhood’s meteoric rise is a leadership team that blends vision, grit, and technical prowess. They’re more than running a company. They’re rewriting the rules of finance.

• Vlad Tenev (CEO & Co-Founder): A Stanford-trained mathematician, Tenev’s obsession with democratizing finance led to commission-free trading, a move that shook the industry. His ability to anticipate trends, like crypto and AI, keeps Robinhood ahead of the curve.

• Baiju Bhatt (Co-Founder): Bhatt, the tech genius behind Robinhood’s early platform, stepped back from daily operations but remains a board member, guiding its long-term vision. His focus on user experience made Robinhood the gold standard for fintech design.

• Jason Warnick (CFO): A former Amazon exec, Warnick brought fiscal discipline, turning Robinhood profitable in 2024. His strategic acquisitions, like TradePMR, show he’s playing the long game.

“We’re not just building a product; we’re building a future where everyone has a seat at the financial table.” — Vlad Tenev, Robinhood CEO

Growth Potential

Robinhood’s growth is nothing short of explosive. From a one-million-person waitlist in 2014 to 25.6 million accounts in 2025, it’s captured the hearts of a generation, with 80% of 2020–2021 accounts joining organically or via referrals.1 Its market cap has soared to $44 billion today, fueled by $3.26 billion in revenue.2 This is what you call a growing company and a cultural force that’s redefining wealth creation, with room to expand globally and into new markets.

Forecast & Company Vision

Robinhood’s vision is bold: to be the world’s leading retail investing platform, where anyone, anywhere, can build wealth effortlessly. It’s doubling down on crypto with the Bitstamp acquisition (set for H1 2025), eyeing Singapore as a global hub, and rolling out copytrading, futures, and wealth management tools via its TradePMR acquisition (February 2025).3

Imagine a future where Robinhood is your broker, your financial advisor, your crypto exchange, and prediction market—all in one app. That’s the kind of ambition that makes investors take notice.

Why Invest In Robinhood?

Robinhood is a powerhouse redefining how people invest. From its game-changing commission-free trading to cutting-edge features like prediction markets and AI-driven tools, Robinhood is capturing the hearts of millions while forcing the financial industry to evolve. Here’s why Robinhood stands out as a compelling investment, highlighting its robust financials, unbreakable competitive moats, visionary leadership, dominant market position, and relentless innovation.

Financials

Robinhood’s financials paint a picture of a company hitting its stride, with numbers that scream growth and stability. Clearly, Robinhood is thriving in a competitive landscape.

• Cash & Debt: With $4.4 billion in cash and equivalents and $9.38 billion in debt, Robinhood has the firepower for acquisitions like Bitstamp, while keeping debt manageable, ensuring flexibility for future bets.4

• Growth Rates: Current trailing twelve month revenue hit $3.26 billion, with quarterly revenue growth at 50%, and quarterly earnings growing at 114%.

• Profitability: Robinhood currently has a 48.77% profit margin with 41.42% operating margin, up from its first profitable year in 2020.

Staggering numbers that prove Robinhood has the financial muscle to keep innovating and scaling, making it a stock you can’t ignore.

Industry Moats

Robinhood is setting the pace with competitive edges that keep rivals scrambling. Its moats are built on innovation, brand power, and operational smarts, creating a fortress around its market position.

• First-Mover Advantage: Robinhood’s 2013 commission-free trading model forced giants like Fidelity, Schwab, and E*TRADE to ditch fees, cementing its role as an industry disruptor. This early lead built a loyal user base that’s hard to poach. Now, nearly all investing platforms are commission-free.

• Brand Loyalty: With 3.2 million Gold subscribers, Robinhood’s brand resonates with younger investors who see it as more than a broker—it’s a lifestyle. It’s viral growth.

• Scalable Platform: Robinhood’s cloud-based infrastructure lets it roll out features like Robinhood Cortex or Prediction Market Hub faster than rivals, keeping it nimble in a fast-evolving industry.

These moats serve as barriers that make Robinhood a tough target for competitors, ensuring it stays ahead for years to come.

Strong Executive Team

Vlad Tenev, Baiju Bhatt, and Jason Warnick bring a mix of vision, technical chops, and financial savvy that’s rare in fintech. Tenev’s big-picture thinking turned commission-free trading into an industry standard, while Bhatt’s user-focused design made Robinhood’s app addictive. Warnick, the Amazon veteran, has brought discipline, guiding Robinhood to profitability and strategic acquisitions like TradePMR. Together, they’re they’re creating trends, from AI analytics to global expansion. This is a team that’s hungry to build the future of finance, and that’s the kind of leadership investors can bet on.

Market Ownership

Robinhood is on it’s way to gaining massive ownership of the brokerage industry. Currently, it has 25.8 million accounts and $221 billion in assets under management, making it the platform of choice for younger investors who want low costs and high engagement.5 Its commission-free crypto trading, with $71 billion in Q4 2024 volumes6, gives it a leg up on pricier rivals like Coinbase. Robinhood’s dominance is apparent in its numbers, and it’s capturing the zeitgeist of a generation that values accessibility and innovation, positioning it to keep growing as more people enter the market.

Innovation - New Products, Market Potential

Robinhood’s innovation engine is its secret weapon, churning out features that lead the industry. Each new product makes investing more inclusive, powerful, and engaging, paving the way for a new era of retail finance. Some noteworthy innovations that are paving (or have already paved) the industry standard include:

• Fractional Shares: The feature that upended the investing industry and successfully accomplished first on Robinhood. This feature lets users buy slices of high-priced stocks like Apple for as little as $1, opening the market to everyone. Its runaway success forced major players like Fidelity and Schwab to follow, proving Robinhood’s knack for setting trends that reshape who can invest.

• Robinhood Strategy: This automated tool builds tailored portfolios based on user goals and risk tolerance, making wealth management a breeze. By rivaling robo-advisors like Betterment, it empowers novices to invest long-term, broadening the industry’s appeal.

• Robinhood Legend: Introduced in 2024, this desktop platform offers advanced charting and multi-monitor support for serious traders. It levels the playing field with platforms like Webull, showing Robinhood can cater to pros while staying true to its accessible roots.

• Prediction Market Hub: This feature allows users to trade event contracts based on outcomes like Federal Reserve rate decisions or sports events, with plans to expand to politics, culture, and more.

• Robinhood Cortex: Unveiled in 2025 as a conceptual framework, Robinhood Cortex envisions integrating AI with traditional investing tools to enhance decision-making, though it’s not yet a fully realized product.

• Future Plans: The Bitstamp acquisition, copytrading, and global crypto expansion are set to supercharge growth. These moves could make Robinhood a one-stop financial hub, capturing massive market share in crypto, wealth management, and beyond.

What started as a company offering fractional shares and commission-free trading evolved into a company paving the way for the future of investing in multiple facets of a brokerage platform.

Competitors to Robinhood

Robinhood faces stiff competition, but its agility and innovation keep it ahead. Here’s how it stacks up:

• Traditional Brokerages: Industry behemoths like Fidelity, Charles Schwab, and E*TRADE boast deep research and customer support, but their clunky platforms and higher costs can’t match Robinhood’s mobile-first, low-fee model, which resonates with younger investors.

• Online Brokerages:

  • Webull: Caters to active traders with advanced tools but lacks Robinhood’s 25.6 million-user scale and broad appeal.

  • SoFi, M1 Finance: Focus on automated investing but don’t match Robinhood’s user growth or feature breadth.

• Crypto Exchanges: Coinbase dominates crypto but charges steep fees. Robinhood’s commission-free crypto trading and upcoming Bitstamp acquisition, backed by $14 billion in Q4 2024 volumes, position it to steal market share.

Robinhood’s ability to blend accessibility, innovation, and scale makes it a tough competitor to beat, giving investors confidence in its staying power.

Potential Risks of Investing In Robinhood

No stock is bulletproof, and Robinhood has its share of hurdles. Regulatory scrutiny looms large, with payment for order flow (PFOF) under threat of bans. Market volatility could dent trading volumes, squeezing revenue in bear markets. Competitors are closing the gap, copying features like fractional shares, while keeping novice investors engaged is critical to avoid dormant accounts, as user research highlights.

However, Robinhood’s diversified revenue streams, from Gold subscriptions to crypto, and its knack for pivoting—like its swift recovery from the 2021 GameStop backlash—show it’s built to weather storms. For savvy investors, these risks are outweighed by the potential rewards.

The Bottom Line

Robinhood is a brokerage leading a revolution, empowering millions with commission-free trading, fractional shares, and cutting-edge tools such as Robinhood Cortex and the Prediction Market Hub. Its 25.8 million users, $2.95 billion in 2024 revenue, and market cap surge to $44 billion prove it’s a financial powerhouse.

With crypto expansion, global ambitions, and relentless innovation, Robinhood is poised to lead fintech for decades. Yes, regulatory risks and competition exist, but its resilience and vision make it a stock you can’t ignore.

Those who have the stomach to embrace this chaos should adhere to the timeless investing principles of Warren Buffett, Peter Lynch, and Charlie Munger (my three favorite long-term value investors, if you haven’t noticed by now).

Volatile markets like these can create golden buying opportunities for disciplined investors who focus on fundamentally strong businesses with wide moats, high returns on equity, and innovative leadership. This article dives into our philosophy and shows how it thrives in today’s erratic market conditions, including navigating fears around tariffs.

The Stock Pickz Philosophy: A Buffett-Munger-Lynch Blueprint

Long-term investing based on sound fundamentals ignores short-term noise and focuses on identifying companies with enduring qualities:

• High Return on Equity (ROE): A sign of efficient capital use to generate profits.

• Double-Digit Quarterly Revenue Growth: Proof of a business expanding rapidly and gaining market share.

• Strong Balance Sheets: Ample cash reserves and low debt to navigate economic uncertainty.

• High Levered Free Cash Flow: Cash available after expenses and reinvestments, reflecting financial flexibility.

• Innovative Executive Teams: Visionary leaders who drive growth and adaptability.

• Wide Industry Moats: Competitive advantages like brand loyalty, patents, or network effects that ensure market dominance.

• High Insider Ownership: Management aligned with shareholders, prioritizing long-term value.

• Market Disruptors: Companies that reshape industries through innovation, like Robinhood, which democratized investing with commission-free trading and user-friendly platforms.

We invest with a 5–10-year horizon, seeking businesses that lead or disrupt their industries and deliver consistent outperformance. This disciplined approach becomes a powerful tool for capitalizing on mispricings in volatile markets.

Current Market Conditions: Volatility and Opportunity

As of late, the market is a tempest of volatility. Macroeconomic uncertainty, geopolitical risks, and shifting investor sentiment fuel wild price swings. Earnings reports are met with perplexing reactions: a company with strong revenue growth might plummet due to short-term guidance, while a firm with declining margins could spike on speculative hype. This disconnect between stock prices and fundamentals, as Buffett famously noted, reflects the market’s short-term role as a “voting machine” rather than a “weighing machine.” For patient investors, these irrational movements create golden buying opportunities—chances to acquire quality companies at discounted prices.

Tariffs: Fear and Opportunity

Recent tariff policies, particularly those associated with President Trump’s economic agenda, have sparked fear in the market, contributing to volatility. Investors worry about rising costs, disrupted supply chains, and trade tensions. However, these concerns obscure a broader trend aligning with the intended outcomes of the tariff strategy.

Companies are increasingly investing in U.S.-based manufacturing to avoid tariff costs, bringing jobs and production back to American soil. Meanwhile, trading partners are coming to the negotiating table to secure favorable deals, fostering long-term economic stability. For Stock Pickz, this creates opportunities to invest in firms capitalizing on domestic growth or benefiting from renegotiated trade terms, particularly those with strong fundamentals and innovative leadership.

The Timeless Strategy: Capitalizing on Chaos

Our approach to long-term investing thrives in turbulent times by anchoring decisions in fundamentals. Here’s how to apply it to today’s volatile market:

1. Exploit Irrational Price Swings

The market often reacts with fear and irrationality, sending stock prices in directions that defy logic. A strong earnings report might trigger a sell-off due to short-term concerns, or a weak report might spark a rally fueled by hype. However, fundamentals (like revenue growth, ROE, and cash flow) reflect a company’s true health. When the market sparks an irrational price swing, if the fundamentals remain sound, this creates prime buying opportunities. Acquiring shares of a fundamentally strong company at a discounted price is a cornerstone of our long-term strategy.

2. Hunt for Wide-Moat Companies at Discounted Prices

Volatility often misprices great businesses. When fear triggers sell-offs, companies with strong competitive advantages, such as proprietary technology or unmatched brand loyalty, may trade below their intrinsic value. These are the moments to strike, acquiring firms with durable moats that ensure long-term profitability.

3. Emphasize Financial Resilience

Companies with high cash reserves and minimal debt can weather market storms without resorting to dilutive financing or harmful cost-cutting. Their strong balance sheets enable continued investment in growth, even when competitors falter. In volatile markets, this resilience is a hallmark of businesses worth owning.

4. Back Innovative Leadership

Visionary executives who prioritize long-term strategy over short-term optics are critical in turbulent times. Leaders who innovate—whether through cutting-edge technology or disruptive business models like those of market disruptors—position their companies to dominate industries for decades. Volatility may obscure their progress, but it also creates chances to invest in these trailblazers at attractive valuations.

5. Tune Out Short-Term Noise

Peter Lynch’s advice to “know what you own and why you own it” is vital in volatile markets. A negative headline or a missed quarterly target doesn’t alter a company’s core strengths. By focusing on the 10+ year outlook, we sidestep knee-jerk reactions and capitalize on temporary mispricings.

6. Value High Insider Ownership

Companies where management holds significant equity stakes signal confidence in the future. Insiders with skin in the game are more likely to prioritize sustainable growth over short-term stock price fluctuations, making these firms prime candidates for long-term investment, especially when volatility creates buying opportunities.

Turning Volatility into Golden Opportunities

Volatile markets are a breeding ground for mispriced stocks. When investor sentiment swings wildly, fundamentally strong companies can be unfairly punished, trading at discounts to their true worth. These moments are golden for Stock Pickz investors.

By sticking to a defined strategy and criteria (i.e., high ROE, strong revenue growth, robust cash flow, wide moats, and disruptive potential), we can scoop up shares of exceptional businesses at bargain prices. As Charlie Munger advises, “The big money is not in the buying or selling, but in the waiting.” Patience transforms volatility from a threat into a chance to build wealth.

Practical Steps for Investors

To harness this strategy in today’s market:

1. Screen for Fundamentals: Use tools like Finviz or Morningstar to identify companies with ROE > 15%, revenue growth > 10%, debt-to-equity < 0.5, and strong free cash flow.

2. Evaluate Moats and Disruption: Research competitive advantages and disruptive potential. Does the company have a unique product, a loyal customer base, or a platform reshaping its industry?

3. Track Insider Ownership: Review SEC filings or platforms like GuruFocus for insider buying or high ownership levels.

4. Seize Mispricings: Build a watchlist of quality companies and act when volatility pushes prices below intrinsic value.

5. Stay Committed: Hold investments for 5–10 years, ignoring daily fluctuations. Reinvest dividends to compound returns.

Conclusion: Discipline Unlocks Opportunity

In a market gripped by fear and irrationality, amplified by tariff concerns, the Stock Pickz philosophy—grounded in the teachings of Buffett, Lynch, and Munger—offers a clear path forward. By focusing on companies with superior fundamentals, wide moats, innovative leadership, and disruptive potential, we turn volatility into golden buying opportunities.

As companies invest in U.S. manufacturing and trade deals take shape, the long-term outlook brightens for fundamentally strong firms. Discipline and patience allow us to acquire exceptional businesses at discounts, setting the stage for outsized returns over the long term. As Buffett reminds us, “The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient.” In turbulent times, stay focused, seize the opportunities, and let the market’s weighing machine reward your resolve.

Inspired by legends like Warren Buffett, Peter Lynch, and Charlie Munger, we hold stocks for 5-10+ years, betting on businesses that grow steadily and weather storms. Today, we’re diving into why Uber Technologies (UBER), despite its household name, doesn’t make the cut for our long-term portfolio. Buckle up, because this ride has some red flags!

Uber’s Appeal: Why It Looks Tempting

I’ll be honest, it almost hurts me a little to add Uber to the Stock Skipz portfolio. Especially since it’s my “go-to” when I’m traveling. I sincerely like the product. As of late, they have had decent financials as well. However, there are deeper issues at hand.

At first glance, Uber seems like a no-brainer. It’s a global leader in ride-hailing, with a growing food delivery arm (Uber Eats) and a freight business. In 2024, Uber reported $44 billion in revenue, up 18% year-over-year.1 Its brand is iconic, and it operates in over 70 countries. For a growth investor, that sounds juicy, right? But when we apply our StockPickz principles, the cracks start to show. Let’s break it down.

Robotaxis: A Looming Threat to the Core Business

We prioritize companies with wide industry moats and market dominance, but Uber’s ride-hailing empire faces a massive disruptor: autonomous vehicles. Waymo, Tesla, and Cruise are pouring billions into robotaxis, which could slash labor costs but also commoditize Uber’s service. If anyone can offer a self-driving ride, what’s stopping customers from choosing the cheapest option?

Uber’s dipping its toes into autonomy through partnerships like Waymo, but it’s not leading the pack. Innovate or die, as Charlie Munger might say, and Uber’s heavy reliance on human drivers (80% of its cost structure) leaves it vulnerable. Our portfolio pick Tesla, with its AI-driven Full Self-Driving tech, is better positioned to dominate this shift. For Uber, robotaxis could mean a costly pivot or obsolescence, neither of which screams “long-term winner.”

A Shaky History: Trust Issues Linger

We value companies with trustworthy leadership and clean reputations. Uber’s past, however, is a bumpy ride. From “Greyball” (a tool to deceive regulators) to misclassifying drivers and surge-pricing controversies, Uber has burned trust with customers, drivers, and regulators. While CEO Dara Khosrowshahi has cleaned house since 2017, the brand still carries baggage. Here’s a list of its history on ethical violations:

1. God View: Uber’s “God View” tool allowed employees to track customers’ real-time locations without consent, including high-profile individuals, violating privacy until restricted in 2014 after public backlash.

2. Hell Program: Uber’s “Hell” program created fake Lyft rider accounts to spy on and poach Lyft drivers, using deceptive tactics to undermine a competitor until exposed in 2017.

3. Fake Ride Bookings: Uber employees booked and canceled thousands of fake Lyft rides in 2014 to disrupt Lyft’s service, harming drivers and customers in a bid to gain market share.

4. Misleading Driver Earnings: Uber settled a $20 million FTC case in 2017 for advertising inflated driver earnings and misleading vehicle financing terms, deceiving drivers to boost recruitment.

5. Ignoring Regulations and Aggressive Lobbying: Uber launched services without permits and used lobbying and a “kill switch” to evade regulators, as revealed in the 2022 Uber Files, undermining legal compliance.

6. Data Breaches and Cover-Ups: Uber paid hackers $100,000 to conceal a 2016 data breach affecting 57 million users, delaying disclosure for over a year, leading to a $148 million settlement in 2018.

7. Rides of Glory: In 2012, Uber analyzed user data to track “Rides of Glory,” identifying likely one-night stands, violating privacy and prompting backlash until the blog post was removed.

In our book, a company’s culture matters. Warren Buffett once said, “It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it,” and Uber has ruined it many times already. New scandals or regulatory backlash could tank Uber’s stock overnight. Compare that to our pick Intuit, with its squeaky-clean image and loyal customer base. Uber’s history makes it a gamble we’d rather skip.

Regulatory Risks: A Global Headache

Our strategy favors businesses with minimal regulatory overhang. Is high regulations a deal-breaker? Not necessarily. But combined with other factors laid out in this article, it just gives us another reason to be hesitant on Uber.

Uber, is a magnet for legal battles. Governments worldwide—from California to the UK—are cracking down on gig economy practices. Laws reclassifying drivers as employees could raise Uber’s costs by 20-30%, per some estimates. In 2024, California’s AB5 and similar EU rules forced Uber to rethink its model, squeezing margins further.

Add to that potential regulations on pricing, emissions, or data privacy, and Uber’s growth feels like a house of cards. We prefer companies like Monster Beverage, which faces fewer regulatory threats and grows steadily. Uber’s legal woes are a long-term drag we can’t ignore.

Economic Sensitivity: Not Recession-Proof

We love companies that thrive in any economy, like our pick Costco, which sells essentials people buy in rain or shine. However, Uber’s services—ride-hailing and food delivery—are discretionary. During recessions, consumers cut back on $20 rides or $15 burrito deliveries. With economic uncertainty looming in 2025 (think potential U.S. recession risks), Uber’s revenue could take a hit.

In Q1 2020, during the pandemic, Uber’s ride-hailing revenue dropped 80%. That’s not the resilience we want in a 10-year hold. Our portfolio’s Waste Management, by contrast, chugs along no matter the economy, because trash collection never stops.

Valuation: Paying a Premium for Risk

We’re disciplined about buying at reasonable valuations. Uber’s P/E ratio as of April 2025 is ~30, higher than the S&P 500’s 25 and peers like Lyft (~20).2 That premium assumes blockbuster growth, but analysts project Uber’s revenue growth slowing to ~11.9% CAGR through 2030, down from its historical 20%.3 With competition heating up and margins staying slim, the stock’s upside feels capped.

Charlie Munger taught us to avoid overpaying for growth. Our pick Shopify, with its 25%+ revenue growth and expanding moat, offers better bang for the buck. Uber’s valuation doesn’t match its risks, making it a pass for us.

Competition: No Moat, No Dominance

A wide moat is non-negotiable for StockPickz. Uber’s ride-hailing and delivery markets are brutally competitive. Lyft, Bolt, and Didi challenge rides, while DoorDash and Just Eat battle Uber Eats. In saturated markets like the U.S., growth is slowing, and emerging markets bring low margins and regulatory hurdles.

Without a clear edge—like Apple’s ecosystem or Airbnb’s network effect—Uber’s market dominance is shaky. Buffett would ask, “What stops a competitor from eating their lunch?” For Uber, the answer is: not much.

The Bottom Line: Why We’re Skipping Uber

Uber’s a household name with growth potential, but it doesn’t fit our StockPickz playbook. Thin margins, robotaxi threats, regulatory risks, economic sensitivity, a pricey valuation, fierce competition, and a checkered past make it a risky long-term bet. We’re not saying Uber’s doomed—its diversification into delivery and freight is promising—but it lacks the stability, moat, and financial strength we demand for a 5-10 year hold.

Could Uber prove us wrong? I certainly hope so! I personally like the company’s product, but can’t get over these barriers outlined here from an investment perspective.

Instead, stick with our portfolio stars like Waste Management, Apple, or Tesla, which check our boxes: high ROE, strong cash flow, wide moats, and innovation that lasts. Uber might be a short-term trade for some, but for long-term wealth, we’re steering clear.

What’s your take? Are you eyeing Uber or sticking to our tried-and-true picks? Drop us a line, and let’s keep the convo going! Until next time, happy investing, and stay picky!

Why Waste Management? The Peter Lynch Magic

If you’ve been with us for a while, you know we’re big fans of Peter Lynch, the legendary investor who taught us to love companies that fly under the radar. Lynch had a knack for spotting businesses so ordinary they’d make you yawn—think laundromats or funeral homes—but boy, did they deliver steady returns. He once said, “The best stock to buy is the one you already own, especially if it’s boring and nobody’s talking about it.” Waste Management fits that bill perfectly. I mean, what’s more unglamorous than picking up trash? Yet, it’s exactly the kind of essential, recession-resistant business Lynch would’ve loved.

Here’s the deal: no matter what’s happening in the world—tariffs spiking, markets wobbling, or headlines screaming chaos—people still need their garbage hauled away. That’s the beauty of Waste Management. It’s a company that keeps chugging along, delivering consistent growth even when the economy’s throwing curveballs. With tariffs making waves in April 2025, WM’s stock is up nearly 15% year-to-date1 (as of this writing), outpacing the S&P 500’s -9.4% return (as of this writing).2 Its low beta of 0.67 means it doesn’t get rattled by market swings, giving you a smoother ride.

The Financials: A Rock-Solid Foundation

Let’s talk numbers, because Waste Management’s financials are a breath of fresh air amongst a chaotic market. This company’s got the kind of stats that make long-term investors sleep easy at night.

• Return on Equity (ROE): 36.24% – This tells us WM is a pro at turning shareholder money into profits. For every dollar of equity, it’s squeezing out over 36 cents of earnings—way above average for most industries.

• Free Cash Flow: $2.159 Billion – WM’s generating serious cash, enough to fund its growth, pay dividends, and weather any surprises.

• Dividend Reliability: 1.44% Yield – With 22 straight years of dividend hikes, the latest to $0.825 per share quarterly, WM is a dream for income seekers. At a stock price around $229, you’re getting a steady paycheck while your investment grows.

• Revenue Growth: 13% Quarterly Jump – In Q4 2024, WM’s revenue hit $5.893 billion, up 13% from the year before. An impressive hustle for a company in a “mature” industry.

• Earnings Growth: 21.3% YoY - Earnings growth that outpaces revenue growth tells a strong story of doing more business while simultaneously cutting costs.

These numbers aren’t just flashy stats—they show a business that’s disciplined, profitable, and built to last. Even with $23.9 billion in debt, WM’s got a $3.5 billion credit facility with $2.1 billion untapped, so it’s got wiggle room to manage that load while planning to trim it down over the next 18 months.3

Growth That Keeps On Truckin’

Now, you might be thinking, “Okay, trash pickup is stable, but where’s the excitement?” Here’s where Waste Management surprises you—it’s not just sitting on its landfill laurels. The company’s got a smart growth playbook, and it’s playing it well.

Take its $7.2 billion acquisition of Stericycle in November 2024.4 That move brought medical waste and secure document shredding into WM’s wheelhouse, opening doors to the fast-growing healthcare sector. It’s like adding a new engine to an already reliable truck. Full-year 2024 revenue climbed 8% to $22.063 billion, fueled by price increases, Stericycle, and even higher prices for recycled materials.5

But it’s not just about buying other companies. WM’s leaning hard into sustainability, turning landfill gas into renewable energy with 102 projects and counting. As the world gets greener, WM’s ahead of the curve, and that’s a growth driver that could pay off big over the next decade. The waste management industry itself is set to grow from $980.7 billion in 2023 to $1,607.6 billion by 2032, according to Market.us, and WM’s poised to grab a hefty slice of that pie.

“We’re not just managing waste; we’re building a sustainable future,” says WM’s leadership on their sustainability page. That’s the kind of forward-thinking we want in a long-term pick.

A Moat Wider Than a Landfill

Here’s where Waste Management really shines: its competitive moat is massive. This isn’t a business where a scrappy startup can roll in and steal the show. WM’s got operations in every U.S. state, with a network of collection trucks, recycling centers, and landfills that’s tough to replicate. It’s like trying to build a new Amazon from scratch—good luck with that.

The company’s scooped up tons of small, local waste businesses over the years, giving it a sneaky advantage: over 62% market share in U.S. waste collection, based on 2022 data from Grand View Research. This kind of dominance is what keeps competitors at bay. Plus, its scale means lower costs per pickup, so WM can keep prices competitive while still raking in profits.

• Market Share Edge: Over 62% in waste collection, making WM the 800-pound gorilla in the room.

• Economies of Scale: Bigger network = lower costs = fatter margins.

• Sustainability Cred: Renewable energy projects make WM a darling for clean energy investors, adding another layer to its moat.

This moat isn’t just about size—it’s about being indispensable. Cities and businesses rely on WM to keep things clean, and that stickiness locks in revenue year after year.

Why It’s a Long-Term Winner

So, why should you consider Waste Management for your portfolio? Picture this: it’s 2035, and you’re sipping coffee, checking your investments. The market’s been up, down, and sideways, but WM’s still there, steadily growing, paying dividends, and maybe even powering your town with renewable energy from its landfills. That’s the power of a boring business done right.

Sure, there are risks—$23.9 billion in debt is nothing to sneeze at, and new regulations could bump up costs. But with $2.159 billion in free cash flow and a plan to deleverage, WM’s got the tools to handle it.6 Its P/E ratio of around 35 is a bit high, hinting at a premium price, but for a company with this kind of stability and growth, it’s a fair trade-off.

Keep in mind that its current debt levels exist due to acquiring companies and expanding its reach - a fair investment for future growing revenues. Furthermore, the PE ratio has likely baked in these acquisitions giving it an appearance of a premium price, but in reality, it’s poised to keep growing steadily.

“Invest in businesses any idiot could run, because someday one will,” Peter Lynch famously quipped. Waste Management’s straightforward model—pick up trash, recycle, repeat—is idiot-proof and built for the long haul.

Let’s Wrap It Up

Waste Management isn’t going to be the hot stock your buddy brags about at the barbecue. But that’s exactly why we love it. It’s the kind of pick that grows quietly in the background, delivering returns while you focus on life’s bigger adventures. With rock-solid financials, a knack for smart acquisitions, and a moat that’d make a medieval castle jealous, WM’s the kind of stock you buy, hold, and thank yourself for later.

So, what do you think? Ready to add a little garbage to your portfolio? Drop us a line on X or hit reply—we’d love to hear your take. Keep picking smart and investing wiser!

The Basics: What Are the Trump Tariffs?

In early 2025, President Donald Trump rolled out a sweeping set of tariffs aimed at reshaping America’s trade landscape. These tariffs include a baseline 10% levy on all U.S. imports, with higher rates targeting specific countries—think 25% on Canada and Mexico, an additional 10-20% on China, and even steeper duties on nations like Japan and the EU. Announced with fanfare on what Trump dubbed “Liberation Day” (April 2, 2025), these measures mark a dramatic shift in U.S. trade policy, pushing the average tariff rate to its highest since the 1930s.

So, why impose them? The stated goal is twofold: to reduce America’s trade deficits and to bring manufacturing jobs back home. Trump has long argued that foreign countries exploit the U.S. through unfair trade practices—high tariffs on American goods, currency manipulation, and lax regulations. His administration claims these “reciprocal tariffs” (set at roughly half of what other nations allegedly charge the U.S.) will level the playing field. The objective? Force other countries to negotiate better trade deals or watch American companies shift production stateside. As Trump put it in a Rose Garden speech, “These tariffs give us great power to negotiate. They’ll either come to the table, or we’ll make it here—and it’ll be beautiful.”

The Stock Market’s Panic Attack

Since the announcement, Wall Street has been in a tailspin. The S&P 500 dropped nearly 5% on April 3, its worst day since the pandemic panic of 2020, shedding over $2.4 trillion in value in a single session. The Nasdaq took a 6% hit, and the Dow wasn’t far behind, losing almost 1,700 points. By Friday, April 4, the carnage continued, with global markets joining the fray—Japan’s Nikkei faced its worst week in years, and China retaliated with a 34% tariff on U.S. goods.

But here’s the kicker: this sell-off isn’t based on cold, hard fundamentals—at least not yet. It’s fear, plain and simple. “The market is reacting like a kid who just saw a ghost,” says Kevin O’Leary, the outspoken investor and Shark Tank star. “It’s all emotion right now. We haven’t even seen the first earnings reports under these tariffs. Everyone’s running for the exits before the story’s written.” And he’s got a point. Tariffs only started being collected days ago (April 6, per Reuters), leaving zero time for companies to report their bottom-line impact.

Why the Fear?

• Inflation Worries: Investors fret that higher import costs will jack up prices, stoking inflation and forcing the Federal Reserve into a policy bind—raise rates and risk a slowdown, or hold steady and let inflation run hot.

• Trade War Escalation: China’s retaliation is just the beginning. If the EU, Japan, and others follow suit, global supply chains could grind to a halt, hammering profits for multinational firms.

• Uncertainty Over Duration: Will Trump stick to his guns, or is this a bluff to force negotiations? The back-and-forth (exemptions for Canada’s USMCA goods, then threats of more levies) has markets on edge.

Yet, fear isn’t fact. The fundamentals—corporate earnings, consumer spending, GDP growth—haven’t shifted dramatically. Not yet, anyway.

The Bigger Picture: Adaptation Is Already Happening

Here’s where it gets interesting. Companies and countries aren’t just sitting still—they’re moving. Some firms are eyeing U.S. production to dodge tariffs, while foreign leaders are scrambling to negotiate. Take Nissan’s Infiniti brand, which paused production of two Mexico-built models for the U.S. market “until further notice,” signaling a potential shift. Meanwhile, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly jetting to the White House this week to haggle with Trump, the first foreign leader to do so post-tariff rollout.

This aligns with Trump’s playbook from his first term. Back in 2018-2019, tariffs on China sparked initial market dips, but the S&P 500 roared back with a 28.8% gain in 2019 as firms adjusted and the Fed cut rates. “History shows tariffs don’t kill markets—they shake them up, then force adaptation,” notes Jim Rickards, currency expert and author of Currency Wars. “Companies either relocate or innovate. Investors who panic miss the rebound.”

Two Paths Forward

• Made in America: Tariffs make importing costlier, nudging companies to build stateside. Steel giant Nucor thrived during Trump’s first-term tariffs as foreign competitors took a hit. Expect more of that.

• Negotiation Wins: Canada’s 30-day tariff suspension and Mexico’s military deployment to the border (postponing its 25% levy) show countries are already bending. Bill Ackman, billionaire hedge fund manager, urged foreign leaders on X to “reach out to Trump immediately” to cut deals, predicting a quick resolution could calm markets.

Both paths suggest the doom-and-gloom narrative might be overblown. It’s too early to say tariffs will tank corporate profits—adaptation takes time, and the market hasn’t given it a chance to play out.

Opportunity Knocks: Buying the Dip

Here’s the silver lining: stocks are on sale. The S&P 500’s 12% drop from its February high has slashed valuations, offering a rare entry point for long-term investors. “When the market freaks out over policy noise, that’s when you buy,” O’Leary advises. “Fear creates discounts. Fundamentals create wealth.” If companies shift production to the U.S. or secure trade concessions, the winners could see outsized gains.

3-5 Stocks Poised to Benefit

These picks lean on historical winners from tariff eras and firms likely to capitalize on a “Made in America” push:

1. Nucor (NUE): This steel titan soared during Trump’s first-term steel tariffs, benefiting from reduced foreign competition. With a P/E of 15 and new tariffs targeting steel imports, it’s primed for another run.

   • Why it works: Domestic production gets a boost as import costs rise.

2. Walmart (WMT): The retail giant has pivoted to U.S. sourcing in past tariff spats, cushioning its margins. Its scale and pricing power make it a safe bet amid volatility.

   • Why it works: Less reliance on imports than peers like Target.

3. Caterpillar (CAT): Heavy machinery thrives when U.S. infrastructure and manufacturing ramp up—both Trump priorities. It held strong in 2018-2019 despite trade jitters.

   • Why it works: Domestic demand could offset global slowdowns.

4. Enterprise Products Partners (EPD): An oil and gas pipeline play, it’s insulated from import chaos and benefits from U.S. energy independence pushes. Jim Cramer flagged it as a tariff-resistant winner on CNBC.

   • Why it works: Energy stays local, dodging trade wars.

5. Texas Roadhouse (TXRH): Restaurants with minimal import exposure shine when supply chains wobble. Cramer likes its domestic focus, and its P/E of 32 reflects growth potential.

   • Why it works: Consumers still eat out, tariffs or not.

The Bottom Line

The Trump tariffs are a shock to the system, no doubt. Markets hate uncertainty, and right now, they’re screaming it. But don’t mistake noise for substance. “This isn’t 1930s Smoot-Hawley,” Rickards cautions. “Modern economies adapt faster than you think.” We’re in the early innings—companies haven’t even filed their first tariff-era earnings yet. Fear has driven prices down, but fundamentals will dictate the recovery.

For investors, this could be a golden moment. Stocks like Nucor, Walmart, and Caterpillar have weathered tariff storms before and come out stronger. If you’ve got cash on the sidelines, consider nibbling now while the market’s in panic mode. As O’Leary puts it, “The best time to buy is when everyone else is scared stiff. That’s how you turn a dip into a fortune.”